Anemia of hematologic malignancies: what are the treatment options?

Abstract

Anemia is a common complication in patients with hematologic malignancies, with incidence rates ranging up to 63%. In myelodysplastic syndromes, anemia is an essential feature of the disease. The decrease in hemoglobin may lead to several symptoms such as fatigue, exhaustion, and impaired quality of life, and it may worsen prognosis. Before the introduction of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO, epoetin alfa), red blood cell transfusions were the traditional treatment for improvement of Hb levels. Transfusions, however, are associated with several adverse events and risks, have only transient effects, and have a limited capacity to ameliorate the symptoms of anemia. Epoetin alfa represents a physiologic treatment option, especially in the long-term treatment of cancer- and cancer treatment-associated anemia, and is well tolerated, with response rates as high as 80%. Epoetin alfa is less effective in the treatment of the anemia of myelodysplastic syndrome, but appears to be synergistic with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. However, not every patient responds to epoetin alfa; to avoid unnecessary interventions and costs, predictors of response have been proposed. This article outlines the advantages and disadvantages of the two major treatment forms of anemia: transfusions and epoetin alfa. Representative studies on the efficacy of epoetin alfa in anemic patients with hematologic malignancies as well as models to predict response to epoetin alfa treatment are summarized.