Anemia and perioperative blood transfusion in patients with colorectal cancer

Perioperative Blood Transfusion Is Associated With Worse Clinical Outcomes in Resected Lung Cancer

To investigate the prevalence of preoperative anaemia and the risks associated with perioperative anaemia and blood transfusion in patients who underwent neurological surgery. Perioperative anaemia has an important impact on neurosurgery patients. The prevalence and risks of perioperative anaemia and blood transfusion in Chinese patients are still unknown. Logistic regression was used to predict adverse outcomes of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and different levels of anaemia. Anaemia and transfusion were compared as independent variables by using a 1:1 match on propensity score. The prevalence of preoperative anaemia in neurosurgical patients was 20.05%; 10.33% patients received RBC transfusion. Perioperative RBC and plasma transfusion rates (P < .001) and average hospital costs (P = .0365) were higher in preoperative moderate-to-severe anaemia patients than in no anaemia patients. Perioperative RBC transfusion patients had longer hospital length of stay (LOS) (P < .001) and higher average hospital costs (P < .001) than no-transfusion patients. The rates of return to the operating room (OR) within 30 days and intensive care unit stay did not demonstrate any significant difference in anaemia and transfusion cohorts, respectively. The status of preoperative anaemia in Chinese neurosurgical patients is associated with increased transfusion rates and hospital costs. Perioperative RBC transfusion is associated with increased length and cost of hospitalisation.

Effect of Perioperative Blood Transfusion on Mortality for Major Urologic Malignancies

Objective Professional surgical societies recommend the identification and treatment of pre-operative anaemia in patients scheduled for abdominal surgery. However, the evidence supporting this recommendation has been of poor quality until the recent release of several randomized controlled trials (RCT) addressing the question. Our aim was to determine if pre-operative iron allows correction of haemoglobin concentration and decreased incidence of peri-operative blood transfusion in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Methods MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL were searched for RCTs written in English and assessing the effect of pre-operative iron on the incidence of peri-operative allogeneic blood transfusion in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Pooled relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD) and mean difference (MD) were obtained using models with random effects. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q-test and quantified using the I2 value. Results Four RCTs were retained for analysis out of 285 eligible articles. MD in haemoglobin concentration between patients with pre-operative iron and patients without pre-operative iron was of 0.81 g/dl (3 RCTs, 95% CI: 0.30 to 1.33, I2: 60%, p = 0.002). Pre-operative iron did not lead to reduction in the incidence of peri-operative blood transfusion in terms of RD (4 RCTs, RD: -0.13, 95% CI: -0.27 to 0.01, I2: 65%, p = 0.07) or RR (4 RCTs, RR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.30 to 1.09, I2: 64%, p = 0.09). Conclusion Pre-operative iron significantly increases haemoglobin concentration by 0.81 g/dl before abdominal surgery but does not reduce the need for peri-operative blood transfusion. Important heterogeneity exists between existing RCTs in terms of populations and interventions. Future trials should target patients suffering from iron-deficiency anaemia and assess the effect of intervention on anaemia-related complications.

Professional surgical societies recommend the identification and treatment of pre-operative anaemia in patients scheduled for abdominal surgery. Our aim was to determine if pre-operative iron allows correction of haemoglobin concentration and decreased incidence of peri-operative blood transfusion in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL were searched for RCTs written in English and assessing the effect of pre-operative iron on the incidence of peri-operative allogeneic blood transfusion in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Pooled relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD) and mean difference (MD) were obtained using models with random effects. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q-test and quantified using the I2 value. Four RCTs were retained for analysis out of 285 eligible articles. MD in haemoglobin concentration between patients with pre-operative iron and patients without pre-operative iron was of 0.81 g/dl (3 RCTs, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.33, I2: 60%, p = 0.002). Pre-operative iron did not lead to reduction in the incidence of peri-operative blood transfusion in terms of RD (4 RCTs, RD: − 0.13, 95% CI − 0.27 to 0.01, I2: 65%, p = 0.07) or RR (4 RCTs, RR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.09, I2: 64%, p = 0.09). To conclude, pre-operative iron significantly increases haemoglobin concentration by 0.81 g/dl before abdominal surgery but does not reduce the need for peri-operative blood transfusion. Important heterogeneity exists between existing RCTs in terms of populations and interventions. Future trials should target patients suffering from iron-deficiency anaemia and assess the effect of intervention on anaemia-related complications.

Blood transfusion is associated with higher postoperative complication. With the availability of autologous blood and erythropoietin, it would be advantageous to identify patients who are at higher risk for requiring blood transfusion. Our aim is to identify possible predictive factors for perioperative blood transfusion in patients undergoing colorectal resection. We examined 206 patients who underwent colorectal resections. We analyzed factors including preoperative hematocrit, age, history of radiation, type of resection, operative blood loss, additional surgical procedure, surgery duration, and comorbidity. Forty-one patients (19.9%) received perioperative blood transfusion. Twenty patients (55.6%) with preoperative hematocrit less than 30 received transfusion (p<0.0001). Twenty-one patients (12.4%) with preoperative hematocrit greater than 30 received perioperative blood transfusion. Thirty-three patients (17.9%) under 65 years received transfusion. Eight patients (36.4%) more than the age of 65 received transfusion (p=0.05). Ten patients (16.1%) without any comorbidity received transfusion, whereas ten patients (15.1%) with one comorbidity, ten patients (22.2%) with two comorbidities, and 11 patients (33.3%) with greater than three comorbidities received blood transfusion (p=0.07). In the multivariate analysis, relative risk of perioperative blood transfusion was 3.63 for patients with preoperative hematocrit less than 30 (p<0.0001), 1.26 for patients more than the age of 65 (p=0.49), and 1.07 for each comorbidity (p=0.62). Patients with higher number of comorbidities and age greater than 65 tend to have lower preoperative hematocrit than other patients. Hematocrit less than 30 is an independent risk factor for requiring perioperative blood transfusion, and patients with hematocrit less than 30 should be considered for autologous blood transfusion and erythropoietin.

There is growing interest in reducing the exposure of patients to allogeneic blood transfusions by lowering preoperative cross-matched blood ordering and adopting alternative practices, such as autologous blood donations. Our aim was to investigate the predictors for perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) in head and neck cancer patients undergoing neck dissection (ND). Retrospective cohort study. Retrospective observational study. All patients who underwent ND between January 2011 and August 2014. The primary outcome measure was PBT. Predictors tested included: gender, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists comorbidity score, Charlson comorbidity index, preoperative hemoglobin level, head and neck primary tumor location, tumor and nodal staging, side and laterality of ND, central versus lateral ND, elective ND, preoperative chemotherapy/radiotherapy/I(131) therapy, history of previous ND, other surgical procedures in addition to the ND, bone resection, use and type of reconstruction, and the use of bony free flap reconstruction. Twenty-one preoperative and operative variables were tested for an association with PBT using univariate and multivariate analyses. Multivariate analysis found only the following three predictors to be significantly associated with PBT in patients undergoing ND: low preoperative hemoglobin level, advanced N stage, and concurrent reconstructive surgery. Evaluation of specific risk factors for predicting the need for PBT prior to neck dissection may be helpful in identifying the head and neck cancer patients in whom preoperative ordering of cross-matched blood is required or who could benefit from alternative means, such as preoperative autologous blood donation. 4.

A novel online calculator to predict perioperative blood transfusion in patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: an international multicenter study

Allogeneic perioperative blood transfusion (PBT) has been associated with higher rates of postoperative complications in patients undergoing colorectal surgery and increased tumor recurrence in cancer patients. Our aim is to evaluate possible predictive factors for PBT, specifically, in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery, in order to identify patients who could benefit from alternatives to allogenic PBT such as erythropoietin administration, autologous blood transfusion, and possibly preoperative blood transfusion. Five hundred patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery between the years 2003 and 2011 were reviewed. Patient demographics and clinicopathologic variables were collected prospectively. Other clinical data were collected directly from the computerized records of the in-hospital blood bank. PBT was defined as transfusion of allogenic red blood cells during the day of operation or within the postoperative hospitalization. The associations between PBT and patient variables were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Of the 500 patients, 134 patients (26.8 %) received PBT. Multivariate analysis revealed four preoperative variables as significant risk factors for PBT: preoperative hemoglobin (P = 0.001), lower rectal surgery (P = 0.009), Charlson comorbidity score (P = 0.001), and malignancy (P = 0.024). Preoperative Charlson score, hemoglobin level, carcinoma, and lower rectum pathologies were found to be independent risk factors for PBT in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Evaluation of these risk factors prior to surgery may be helpful in selecting the patients who could benefit from possible alternatives to perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion and help constitute guidelines for a more responsible use of these alternatives.

1818 PERIOPERATIVE BLOOD TRANSFUSION INCREASES THE RISK OF OVERALL MORTALITY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING RADICAL CYSTECTOMY FOR BLADDER CANCER

The purpose is to identify risk factors for perioperative blood transfusion in patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease. This study is a retrospective chart review including all the patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign disease between January 1st 2018 and December 31st 2019. Patients who received perioperative blood transfusion were identified and compared to those who did not. The following risk factors for blood transfusion were analyzed: route of hysterectomy, BMI, presence of adhesions, history of cesarean section, uterine weight. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the data. A total of 517 patients were identified and included in the study. Forty-seven patients (9.09%) received a perioperative blood transfusion. The abdominal hysterectomy route (TAH) was a significant risk factor for receiving blood transfusion (p = 0.012). Other identified risk factors for blood transfusion included: Body mass index above 33.0 (p = 0.002), and uterine weight (p = 0.002). There was no association between the presence of pelvic adhesions (p = 0.91) or a personal history of cesarean section (p = 0.89) and receiving perioperative blood transfusion. When analyzing only the patients who underwent TLH, the presence of pelvic adhesion was found as a risk factor for perioperative blood transfusion (p = 0.024). The abdominal hysterectomy route, the presence ofa large uterus, and obesity are risk factors for receiving a blood transfusion. Early identification of the patient at risk of requiring perioperative blood transfusion provides better patient counseling and surgical preparation.

Perioperative blood transfusion affects oncologic outcomes after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

96: Risk factors for perioperative blood transfusion in patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease

BackgroundTo investigate the relationship between preoperative low serum albumin and perioperative blood transfusion in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA).MethodsWe enrolled 2,772 TJA patients from our hospital between January 1, 2017, and January 1, 2022. Clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records, including patient ID, sex, BMI (Body Mass Index), age, and diagnoses. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to establish thresholds for serum albumin levels categorization. Propensity score matching (PSM) was developed with preoperative serum albumin as the dependent variable and perioperative blood transfusion-related factors as covariates, including BMI grade, age grade, sex, diagnosis, hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic bronchitis, cerebral infarction, major surgeries within the last 12 months, renal failure, cancer, depression, corticosteroid use, smoking, drinking, and blood type. The low serum albumin group was matched with the normal albumin group at a 1:2 ratio, employing a caliper value of 0.2. Binary logistic regression was employed to analyze the outcomes.ResultsAn under the curve of 0.601 was discovered, indicating a cutoff value of 37.3 g/L. Following PSM, 892 cases were successfully paired in the low serum (< 37.3 g/L) albumin group, and 1,401 cases were matched in the normal serum albumin (≥ 37.3 g/L) group. Binary logistic regression in TJA patients showed that the albumin OR was 0.911 with 95%CI 0.888–0.935, P < 0.001. Relative to the preoperative normal serum albumin group, TJA patients in the low serum albumin group experienced a 1.83-fold increase in perioperative blood transfusion rates (95% CI 1.50–2.23, P < 0.001). Compared to the normal serum albumin group, perioperative blood transfusion rates for TJA patients with serum albumin levels of 30–37.3 g/L, 25–30 g/L, and ≤ 25 g/L increased by 1.63 (95% CI 1.37–1.99, P < 0.001), 5.4 (95% CI 3.08–9.50, P < 0.001), and 6.43 times (95% CI 1.80-22.96, P = 0.004), respectively.ConclusionIn TJA patients, preoperative low serum albumin levels have been found to be associated with an increased risk of perioperative blood transfusion. Furthermore, it has been observed that the lower the preoperative serum albumin level is, the higher the risk of perioperative blood transfusion.Trial registration28/12/2021, Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCRT2100054844.

Allogeneic perioperative blood transfusions (PBT) have been associated with higher rates of postoperative complications and tumour recurrence in a number of malignancies. This study evaluates the risk factors for PBT in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy (PN), in order to identify patients who could benefit from alternatives to allogenic blood. Data on 822 patients who underwent elective PN between 1988 and 2013 were analysed. Patient demographics and clinicopathologic variables were collected retrospectively. PBT was defined as transfusion of allogeneic red blood cells during PN (in the operating-room) or postoperative hospitalization. Of the 822 patients, 122 (14.8%) received PBT. Of these, 45.9% were transfused intraoperatively and 47.5% in the postoperative period. Only 14.3% of the patients who were transfused intraoperatively required additional postoperative transfusions. On multivariable analysis, age ≥65 (P < 0.01), lower preoperative haemoglobin levels (P < 0.001), larger renal masses (P < 0.001), central lesions (P < 0.01) and cumulative surgical experience (P < 0.001) were found to be associated with higher rate of PBT. Age, low preoperative haemoglobin level, lesion size, surgeons' experience and central renal lesions are independent pre-operative risk factors for PBT in patients undergoing PN. Evaluation of these risk factors prior to surgery may be helpful in constituting guidelines for a more responsible use of allogeneic blood and its alternatives.