Abstract
The study is accomplished to develop the strategy to reveal publication and patent activity leaders in the Russian Federation based on the data provided by Scopus, Web of Science and Derwent. The study task is to analyze various approaches to selecting these leaders on the basis of primary machine-readable data in XML format generated by Scopus, Web of Science and Derwent. The authors have examined the ratings of Leiden (fractional estimate method), QS World University Rankings and Academic Ranking of World Universities (weighed indicator per one researcher, selecting a quality rating method). They conclude that these methods do not comprise any integrated index for comparable Scopus and Web of Science bibliometrical parameters, and leave the number of patents granted out of account. The authors examine the necessity for comparing institutional leaders of publication activity and patent activity leaders. The study is accomplished within the state order of the RF Ministry of Science and Higher Education “Developing the system of strategic and content monitoring of science, research, technological and innovative activities as related to the target and supplementary indicators of programmatic documents (Strategy of the scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation, Science National Project, National Program “Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation”) (730000F.99.1.BV16AA02001); (730000F.99.1.BV16AA02001).
Highlights
Представлено исследование, проведённое в рамках разработки методического подхода для выявления организаций – лидеров публикационной и патентной активности в Российской Федерации на основе данных Scopus, Web of Science и Derwent
Analyzing international and Russian rankings of science and research organizations The study is accomplished to develop the strategy to reveal publication and patent activity leaders in the Russian Federation based on the data provided by Scopus, Web of Science and Derwent
The study task is to analyze various approaches to selecting these leaders on the basis of primary machine-readable data in XML format generated by Scopus, Web of Science and Derwent
Summary
Вопросы построения рейтингов организаций и описания методологии рейтингования широко освещены в научной литературе [3,4,5,6] и на сайтах зарубежных и отечественных компаний, осуществляющих рейтингование. Существуют международные и внутристрановые рейтинги организаций, выполняющих научные исследования и разработки. Принцип формирования любого рейтинга – ранжирование значений показателей, учитывающих множество факторов. Рассматриваемые рейтинги по признаку географического охвата можно условно разделить на мировые – ранжирующие университеты разных стран мира, и национальные. Далее можно провести деление по признаку использования библиометрических данных Представляют интерес конкретные библиометрические данные, используемые поставщиками рейтингов, однако не для всех рейтингов эта информация открыта. Мы проанализировали универсальные по тематической направленности рейтинги, специальные – не рассматривали
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
