Abstract

The deposition of mineral scales such as barium sulfate and calcium carbonate in producing oil wells is a well-known problem in the oil industry, costing many millions of dollars per year to solve. The main preventative measure for managing downhole scale is to inject chemical scale inhibitor (SI) back into the producing well and out into the near well reservoir formation in a so-called “squeeze” treatment. The scale inhibitor is retained in and subsequently released from the formation by the two main mechanisms of “adsorption” (Gamma ) and “precipitation” (Pi ). As the well is brought back onto production, the scale inhibitor then desorbs (adsorption) or re-dissolves (precipitation) and the low SI concentration that is present in the produced water effectively retards the scale deposition process. A complete model of SI retention must have a full kinetic Gamma {/}Pi model embedded in a transport model for flow through porous media. In this paper, we present a subcase of this model involving only kinetic precipitation (Pi ). The simple quasi-linear problem with an infinite source of precipitate is straightforwardly soluble using conventional methods for a precipitate described by a solubility C_mathrm{s} and a dissolution rate kappa . However, the problem with a finite amount of precipitate is more complex and novel analytical solutions are presented for the (transient) behavior for this case. The mathematical difficulty in this latter system arises because, when the precipitate is fully dissolved close to the system inlet, a moving internal boundary develops along with some related flow regions defined by the parameters of the problem. The problem is solved here by making certain assumptions about the internal moving point at position alpha _Pi , where Pi = 0, and we derive an expression for the velocity of this point (mathrm{d}alpha _Pi {/}mathrm{d}t). From this, we then build the solution for all possible regions which may develop (depending on the problem parameters). Understanding the behavior of this idealized system gives us some practical formulae for precipitation squeeze design purposes. It also serves as an important set of reference solutions in the search for analytical solutions of more complex cases of the Gamma {/}Pi model which we will investigate in forthcoming papers.

Highlights

  • Chemical scale inhibitors (SIs) are commonly applied in oil fields to prevent the formation and deposition of “scale” minerals such as barium sulfate (BaSO4) and calcium carbonate (CaCO3)

  • SI adsorption can be described by a generalized adsorption isotherm, (C), and precipitation may be modeled by a solubility function, (C), and a dissolution rate constant (Sorbie et al 1992; Yuan et al 1994b; Malandrino et al 1995)

  • We have explored the properties of a simple model for the kinetic precipitation of scale inhibitor

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Chemical scale inhibitors (SIs) are commonly applied in oil fields to prevent the formation and deposition of “scale” minerals such as barium sulfate (BaSO4) and calcium carbonate (CaCO3). Other workers have described SI retention by both an adsorption mechanism at low [SI] and a precipitation/dissolution mechanism at higher concentrations based on the solubility of the various Ca_SI salts that are formed (Kan et al 1992, 2004) All of these mechanisms are appropriate in certain circumstances, and the issue is not which approach is correct, but when each mechanism is correct and should be applied. Work on unifying the various approaches has led to a complete formulation of a generalized kinetic coupled adsorption/precipitation ( / ) model (Sorbie 2010). An interesting composite solution of the model is obtained when the process is allowed to evolve long enough for the precipitate to be used up entirely This solution constitutes a base case that may be extended to a more complex version of the model in which varying flow rates are used (Stamatiou and Sorbie 2018b). Here we will take a much simpler approach in order to clarify what is happening in kinetic precipitation processes in 1D rock cores (at the laboratory scale) in order to obtain some useful working formulae to describe the process

Bulk Precipitation
Kinetic Precipitation in a 1D Linear Core System
Method of Characteristics
Interpretation of the Solution in Terms of Characteristics
Numerical Example
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.