Abstract
In addition to the ever-increasing demand for broader bandwidth per user, which results from the continuous development of new bandwidth-hungry services and applications, the consequent upgrade from the currently deployed Time-Division Multiplexing Passive Optical Networks (TDM-PONs) to Next-Generation Optical Access Networks (NG-OANs) has become inevitable. Different architectures for creating a NG-OAN have been proposed in the literature. Among those architectures, the DWDM and TDM/DWDM-Based OANs are very promising candidates. They were mainly proposed to exploit the large wavelength counts available in the fibre (its virtual unlimited bandwidth) to achieve a significant increase in the system capacity. Moreover, they allow coexistence in an open access environment among different network operators. In this study, we first analyze the impact of in-band crosstalk, out-of-band crosstalk to evaluate the performance of the Arrayed Waveguide Grating (AWG). The reason to focus on the AWG is due to this optical device is used almost in all DWDM and TDM/WDM-PONs. We then turn our attention to analyze the impact of group velocity dispersion GVD to estimate the maximum allowable bit rate for optical transmission without the need for using a Dispersion Management Technique (DMT) and/or a Forward Error Correction Technique (FECT). The analysis was performed using Matlab software (The Math works, Inc., Natick, MA, USA) and confirms that the in-band crosstalk has a stronger effect than the out-of-band crosstalk because its noise floor is reached at a lower crosstalk noise and with fewer crosstalk components. The in-band crosstalk noise should be kept below -37 dB and -34 dB to maintain a power penalty of less than 1 dB if 15 and 7 in-band crosstalk components are considered, respectively. The out-of-band crosstalk noise should be kept below -20.3 dB and -17.18 dB to maintain a power penalty of less than 1 dB if 240 and 56 out-of-band crosstalk components are considered, respectively. It was observed that the GVD noise floor is reached at a shorter fiber length as the bit rate increases and it was confirmed that a significant improvement in which the GVD noise floor is reached at longer fiber can be achieved if an externally modulated, small spectral-width source is used when a bit rate of 622 Mbps, 1 Gps, or 2.5 Gbps is used. However, a dispersion management technique becomes necessary if the bit rate increases to 10 Gbps or more.
Highlights
The history of investment in optical fibers for access networks started in the early nineties, when there was an anticipated growth of bandwidth demand
The results are based on the mathematical derivations that have been performed in subsections 2.1 and 2.2 where the effects of in-band crosstalk and out-of-band crosstalk in an N×N Arrayed Waveguide Grating (AWG) were evaluated, respectively
It is obvious that the power penalty increases in each case as the in-band crosstalk noise increases until the noise reaches the point of the in-band crosstalk floor, where the penalty tends to infinity
Summary
The history of investment in optical fibers for access networks started in the early nineties, when there was an anticipated growth of bandwidth demand. To further increase the downstream data rate to 10 Gbps, IEEE and ITU-T ratified new standards (10G-EPON [IEEE802.3av] and XG-PON [ITU-T G.987]) in 2009 and 2010, respectively, for nextgeneration optical access networks. TDM offers a cost-effective approach, its main drawback is its sharing-traffic nature, which poses a significant challenge towards future upgradeability To overcome this limitation, different architectures have been proposed in the literature to create a next-generation optical access network (Grobe and Elbers, 2008; Kani, 2010; Kazovsky et al, 2011) based on either Wavelength-Division Multiplexing (WDM) or hybrid TDM/WDM technologies. We focus on providing analytical analyses concerning the first stage design In these analyses, we first analyze the impact of in-band crosstalk and out-of-band crosstalk and their associated power penalties because they control the performance of the AWG in its application in the DWDM and/or TDM/DWDM optical networks as a multiplexer, demultiplexer, or router
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.