Abstract

ObjectiveTo statistically analyze the results obtained from biomechanical tests on fixation of femoral neck fractures of Pauwels III type, in synthetic bone, using the dynamic hip system with an anti-rotation screw, versus a control group. MethodsTen synthetic bones from a Brazilian manufacturer (model C1010) were used and divided into two groups: test and control. In the test group, fixation of an osteotomy was performed with 70° of inclination at the level of the femoral neck, using DHS with an anti-rotation screw. The resistance of this fixation was evaluated, along with its rotational deviation at 5mm of displacement (phase 1) and at 10mm of displacement (phase 2), which was considered to be failure of synthesis. In the control group, the models were tested in their entirety until femoral neck fracturing occurred. ResultsThe test values in the test group (samples 1–5) in phase 1 were: 1512N, 1439N, 1205N, 1251N and 1273N, respectively (mean=1336N; standard deviation [SD]=132N). The rotational deviations were: 4.90°, 3.27°, 2.62°, 0.66° and 0.66°, respectively (mean=2.42°; SD=1.81°). In phase 2, we obtained: 2064N, 1895N, 1682N, 1713N and 1354N, respectively (mean=1742N; SD=265N). The failure loading values in the control group were: 1544N, 1110N, 1359N, 1194N and 1437N, respectively (mean=1329N; SD=177N). The statistical analysis using the Mann–Whitney test showed that the test group presented maximum loading at a displacement of 10mm, i.e. significantly greater than the failure loading of the control group (p=0.047). ConclusionThe mechanical resistance of the test group was significantly greater than that of the control group.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.