Abstract

Abstract Automatic sensing machines often provide a mass of geometric boundary information that has to be analyzed in order to estimate desired geometric parameters of part features. This problem has been approached primarily by curve fitting and often ad-hoc and arbitrary definitions of geometric dimensioning and tolerancing terms such as “size” and “position”. As indicated in ANSI and ISO standards and as evident to designers, parts do not make contact on best fit surfaces but on their extreme functional boundaries. In this paper, definitions based on computational geometry are given to formalize the meaning of geometric imperfections according to the implications of the standards. Given two-dimensional data point patterns, the problem of determining the size, form, orientation, and position of circular, planar, and parallel-plane features are formally expressed. Those definitions which lead to known solution techniques in computational geometry are identified. Solutions to other problems not found in related studies are presented, such as the roundness problem and the size of parallel-plane features. A formal technique for dealing with datum related features is also presented. Finally, an example is given that illustrates how a typical position tolerance can be verified with a simple procedure. The application of these techniques is demonstrated in automated dimensional inspection and in modeling of manufactured part geometries.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.