Abstract

Given a linear self-adjoint differential operator mathscr {L} along with a discretization scheme (like Finite Differences, Finite Elements, Galerkin Isogeometric Analysis, etc.), in many numerical applications it is crucial to understand how good the (relative) approximation of the whole spectrum of the discretized operator mathscr {L},^{(n)} is, compared to the spectrum of the continuous operator mathscr {L}. The theory of Generalized Locally Toeplitz sequences allows to compute the spectral symbol function omega associated to the discrete matrix mathscr {L},^{(n)}. Inspired by a recent work by T. J. R. Hughes and coauthors, we prove that the symbol omega can measure, asymptotically, the maximum spectral relative error mathscr {E}ge 0. It measures how the scheme is far from a good relative approximation of the whole spectrum of mathscr {L}, and it suggests a suitable (possibly non-uniform) grid such that, if coupled to an increasing refinement of the order of accuracy of the scheme, guarantees mathscr {E}=0.

Highlights

  • If L (n) is a matrix that discretizes a linear self-adjoint differential operator L, obtained by a discretization scheme like Finite Differences (FD), Finite Elements (FE), Isogeometric Galerkin Analysis (IgA), etc., several problems require thatPartially supported by INdAM-GNAMPA and INdAM-GNCS.1 3 Vol.:(0123456789) 38 Page 2 of 47D

  • Inspired by the latter work [24], we show that the symbol can measure the maximum spectral relative error E defined in (1.1) and it suggests a suitable grid such that, if coupled to an increasing refinement of the order of accuracy of the scheme, guarantees E = 0

  • We present an asymptotic result, Theorem 3.1, which connects the eigenvalue distribution of a matrix sequence and the monotone rearrangement of its spectral symbol

Read more

Summary

Introduction

If L (n) is a matrix that discretizes a linear self-adjoint differential operator L , obtained by a discretization scheme like Finite Differences (FD), Finite Elements (FE), Isogeometric Galerkin Analysis (IgA), etc., several problems require that.

38 Page 2 of 47
38 Page 4 of 47
Spectral symbol and monotone rearrangement
Spectral symbol
Monotone rearrangement
Asymptotic spectral distribution
Monotone rearrangement and spectral distribution
38 Page 8 of 47
Local and maximum spectral relative errors
Linear self‐adjoint differential operators and eigenvalue distribution
Numerical experiments
Application to Euler‐Cauchy differential operator
38 Page 14 of 47
Approximation by 3‐points central FD method on uniform grid
38 Page 16 of 47
38 Page 20 of 47
38 Page 22 of 47
38 Page 24 of 47
Conclusions
38 Page 26 of 47
38 Page 28 of 47
38 Page 30 of 47
38 Page 32 of 47
38 Page 36 of 47
38 Page 40 of 47
38 Page 42 of 47
38 Page 44 of 47
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.