Abstract
The general problem of the feasibility criteria for interim water supplies is analyzed. Two forms are presented: (1) a combination of an interim supply and a long‐term supply and (2) the possibility of multiple interim supply projects and a long‐term supply. Both forms are compared with an immediate long‐term conventional water system. A problem formulation that yields to the optimal deferment period of the long‐term supply system is presented. The cost effectiveness of a combined desalting‐surface supply system is discussed, and a numerical example is presented. A table relating the different costs of the interim and long‐term projects with the water requirement is calculated. This table provides the optimal deferment period for the long‐term projects. The numerical results show that although the desalting system described clearly would not be competitive as a complete substitute for the surface system, the combination system of desalting for 10 years followed by the surface system is fully competitive.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.