Abstract
In connection with the development of breeding and the creation of new plant varieties, the problem of their genotyping and identification is becoming increasingly important, therefore the use of molecular methods to identify genetic originality and assess plant genetic diversity appears to be relevant. As part of the work performed, informative ISSR and IRAP DNA markers promising for the study of genetic diversity of the Rosa L. genus were sought and applied to analysis of genetic relationships among 26 accessions of the genus Rosa L. from the gene pool collection of Nikita Botanical Gardens. They included 18 cultivated varieties and 8 accessions of wild species. The species sample included representatives of two subgenera, Rosa and Platyrhodon. The subgenus Platyrhodon was represented by one accession of the species R. roxburghii Tratt. Cultivated roses were represented by varieties of garden groups hybrid tea, floribunda, and grandiflora. The tested markers included 32 ISSRs and 13 IRAPs. Five ISSR markers (UBC 824, ASSR29, 3A21, UBC 864, and UBC 843) and three IRAPs (TDK 2R, Сass1, and Сass2) were chosen as the most promising. They were used for genotyping the studied sample of genotypes. In general, they appeared to be suitable for further use in studying the genetic diversity of the genus Rosa L. The numbers of polymorphic fragments ranged from 12 to 31, averaging 19.25 fragments per marker. For markers UBC 864 and UBC 843, unique fingerprints were identified in each accession studied. The genetic relationships of the studied species and varieties of roses analyzed by the UPGMA, PCoA, and Bayesian methods performed on the basis of IRAP and ISSR genotyping are consistent with their taxonomic positions. The genotype of the species R. roxburghii of the subgenus Platyrhodon was determined genetically as the most distant. According to clustering methods, the representative of the species R. bengalensis did not stand out from the group of cultivated varieties. When assessing the level of genetic similarity among the cultivated varieties of garden roses, the most genetically isolated varieties were ‘Flamingo’, ‘Queen Elizabeth’, and ‘Kordes Sondermeldung’; for most of the other varieties, groups of the greatest genetic similarity were identified. This assessment reflects general trends in phylogenetic relationships, both among the studied species of the genus and among cultivated varieties.
Highlights
According to the Plant List database, the genus Rosa L. includes 373 recognized species
In this work, we evaluated the genetic relationship of varieties from the gene pool collection of roses of the Nikita Botanical Gardens
Two varieties have a minor contribution of wild species ‘Flamingo’ and ‘Queen Elizabeth’, in its turn, the genotype of R. bengalensis occupies an intermediate position between the groups of wild species and cultivated varieties
Summary
According to the Plant List database (www.theplantlist.org), the genus Rosa L. includes 373 recognized species. The world range of garden roses includes more than 30 thousand varieties. The international classification divides all this diversity into 36 garden groups according to its decorative and biological characteristics (McFarland, 2007). Rose breeding efforts have increased in recent years in Japan, China, India, Canada, and New Zealand (Plugatar et al, 2017). In Russia, breeding work with roses has been successfully carried out in the Nikita Botanical Gardens (NBG) since 1824 (Plugatar, 2016). Roses from the garden groups floribunda, grandiflora, miniature, and hybrid tea have flowering periods from 180 to 200 days a year, depending on the variety, and are the most promising and popular in gardening (Plugatar et al, 2017)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
