Abstract

Cathodic protection, often taught in curricular units, such as corrosion and materials science, is an important subject in the study of chemical engineering. The implementation of lab setups and experimental activities in this field, are core to promoting understanding of the underlying concepts and to developing “hands-on” skills fundamental to the success of future process engineers. This paper reports the influence of different variables on the electrical potential and current behaviors of an educational cathodic protection system operated with a single drainage point. The system comprised a steel bar cathode connected to a zinc sacrificial anode, both placed in aqueous medium. The study variables were the anode area, the cathode diameter, the NaCl electrolyte concentration and the anode placement. Each variable showed a specific influence on the attenuation curves, allowing us to conclude that: (1) increasing the sacrificial anode area, or decreasing the resistivity of the medium, promotes more electronegative potentials on the structure and higher currents; (2) increasing the cathode diameter decreases the protection capacity; (3) positioning the anode in the middle of the cathode lengthwise gives rise to a more balanced potential distribution; and (4), the attenuation curves, both for potential and current, can be successfully predicted using equations based on Morgan and Uhlig’s work. High correlations were obtained between the experimental and modeling data for all the studied variables.

Highlights

  • Cathodic protection (CP) has been understood for about 170 years

  • The attenuation curves, for both potential and current intensity as a function of the sacrificial anode area are shown in Figures 5 and 6

  • By positioning the anode in the middle of the cathode lengthwise, the decrease was smaller than when it was positioned at the edge

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cathodic protection (CP) has been understood for about 170 years It has primarily been used for protecting ordinary structural steel in soil and seawater, and less often for steel exposed to fresh water. The use of this technology has increased considerably in recent decades in response to expanding offshore oil and gas exploration and production. It is the main protection method for the large submerged parts of fixed oil installations, and is often the only protection for parts freely exposed to seawater [1]. The reactions (Equations (3) and (4)) describe the formation of these passive films

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.