Abstract
Present study is aimed to compare the performance of SLEUTH model from two different calibration methods, that is, brute force and GA in term of computational efficiency of calibration processes, capturing urban growth, a form of growth or growth pattern and its spatial distribution. SLEUTH has been parameterized for Ajmer city (India) and its performance has been compared in term of eight parameters/methods, that is, computational efficiency, model fitness that is, OSM, urban shape index, best fit coefficient values, hit-miss-false alarm method, kappa statistics, accuracy percentage and visual analysis. GA-based calibration has been found to be computationally more efficient and relatively better in capturing urban growth and form of growth as compared to brute force. Brute force calibration seems to be slightly better considering urban hits as compared to GA, however, GA is better with respect to lesser false alarms.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
