Abstract

The objective of this research is to find out and analyze the appropriateness between accounting policy with PP No 71 Year 2010 in Samarinda City’s Government.. The hypothesis of this study is that there is a difference between the implementations of Samarinda City Government’s Accounting Policy about admissions, measurements, and disclosures on inventory, investment, fix asset, LRA revenues, LO revenues, expenditures and expenses were based on Peraturan Pemerintah Number 71 year 2010 about Government Accounting Standard.The basic theory of this research is public accounting especially about Government Accounting Standard. The hypothesis in this research is, there are implementations Accounting Policy about inventories is not highly appropriate with Accrual Based Government Accounting Standard PP 71 year 2010, implementations Accounting Policy about investments is not highly appropriate with Accrual Based Government Accounting Standard as on PP 71 year 2010, implementations Accounting Policy about fix assets is not highly appropriate with Accrual Based Government Accounting Standard as on PP 71 year 2010, implementations Accounting Policy about LRA revenues and LO revenues are not highly appropriate with Accrual Based Government Accounting Standard as on PP 71 year 2010, implementations Accounting Policy about expenditures and expenses are not highly appropriate with Accrual Based Government Accounting Standard as on PP 71 year 2010.As the results of the study, the implementations Accounting Policy about inventories is appropriate with Accrual Based as on PP 71 year 2010, implementations Accounting Policy about investments is highly appropriate with Accrual Based as on PP 71 year 2010, implementations about fix assets is highly appropriate with Accrual Based as on PP 71 year 2010, implementations Accounting Policy about LRA revenues and LO revenues are appropriate with Accrual Based as on PP 71 year 2010, implementations Accounting Policy about expenditures and expenses are appropriate with Accrual Based as on PP 71 year 2010. The differences found indicates that adjustments were needed for the Samarinda City to follow PP Number 71 year 2010 guidelines.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.