An update on soil gas harvesting technique as a non-depleting source of 222Rn for a large volume calibration chamber for long-term exposure experiments

Abstract

ObjectiveTo demonstrate the versatility of the natural soil gas harvesting technique, coupled with a semi-dynamic injection algorithm, as an efficient and reliable source for continuous 222Rn delivery to a large-volume calibration chamber across different soil conditions and climatic conditions. MethodsLong-term experiments were performed during three seasons of a year in a tropical monsoonal climatic region with high rainfall on the Southwest Coast of India. Soil gas extraction was performed using soil-gas probes, inserted to ∼ 1 m deep into the ground. Soil gas was harvested at a flow rate of 60 lpm, passed through a moisture trap, a 222Rn progeny filter, and a delay volume and pumped into a 222Rn calibration chamber of volume 22.7 m3. Continuous monitoring of 222Rn concentration in the chamber was performed using ionization chamber-based reference monitors. To achieve and maintain the desired 222Rn concentration values in the calibration chamber, the semi-dynamic injection method was adopted, in which the 222Rn concentration in the soil gas was monitored periodically, and injection into the chamber was controlled using a well-defined pumping algorithm. Three ranges of 222Rn concentration values were chosen as the target values to be maintained in the calibration chamber for long-term experiments (15 d): (i) low concentration (500 - 1,000 Bq/m3), (ii) medium concentration (1,000 - 10,000 Bq/m3), and (iii) high concentration (10,000 – 25,000 Bq/m3). ResultsThe achieved 222Rn concentration values were in good agreement with the target values, with deviations of 12%, 8% and 5% for the low, medium and high concentration exposures, respectively, during the summer season. During the monsoon season, the deviations between the target and the achieved concentration values were 12%, 10% and 5% for low, medium and high concentration exposures, respectively, and the corresponding deviations were 12%, 4%, and 5% for the winter season. These deviations are well within the cumulative uncertainty associated with the measurements. ConclusionsThe results of this study conclusively demonstrate that the soil gas harvesting method, when coupled with the semi-dynamic injection approach, is a reliable method for generating and maintaining the desired 222Rn concentration in the large volume calibration chamber during different seasons and environmental conditions.