An Overview of Safety and Efficacy Between Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-Prolyl-Hydroxylase Inhibitors and Erythropoietin-Stimulating Agents in Treating Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients.

Abstract

Anemia is one of the common complications in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Erythropoietin and iron deficiencies are the major causes to develop anemia in CKD patients. Untreated anemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESA) with iron supplementation are the standard for treating renal anemia. Although ESA with iron supplementation is an effective therapy in maintaining serum hemoglobin (Hb) levels, it increases the risk of several life-threatening adverse events such as hypertension, thromboembolism, cardiovascular morbidity, and mortality with long-term use. Therefore, effective alternate therapy with better safety and efficacy is needed to treat renal anemia. The newer oral therapy hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHI) can potentially be an effective alternative therapy in treating renal anemia. This review article compares the safety and efficacy between HIF-PHI and ESA in treating anemia in CKD patients. We conducted a comprehensive literature review of articles, including clinical trials, meta-analyses, and reviews, that compared the safety and efficacy between HIF-PHI and ESA. Studies have shown that the newer oral therapy, HIF-PHI, was non-inferior to ESA to maintain serum Hb levels in CKD patients. Moreover, the adverse event profile was almost similar in both groups. However, as the studies we reviewed have small sample sizes and short duration periods, the long-term effectiveness and safety of HIF-PHI over ESA in treating renal anemia cannot be established.