Abstract
Some ideas coming from Multi Criteria Decision Aid are here extended to group decision. We present a logical model in order to reflect the degree of truth of the following predicate “group G considers that option x is at least as good as y.” The proposal considers the strength of the majority using its number and the intensity of its preference, and it also acknowledges the importance of the minorities of a certain numerical significance that manifest an intense disagreement with the predicate of the outranking. The effects of the “majority dictatorship” are restricted. Since it considers simultaneously the strength of the majority, the importance of unhappy minorities, and the intensity of the preference/opposition, this model exhibits desirable qualities of the classic methods by Condorcet and Borda. This model can be used to solve problems regarding selection, ranking, classification, and sorting. Various examples are given, which show the quality of the solutions that were obtained.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
