Abstract

New York adopted an industry-specific value added tax (VAT) to solve problems with virtual intermediaries (room remarketers) under its hotel accommodations tax. The New York VAT resembles the VAT used in the European Union (EU). It is a credit-invoice VAT that subjectively values supplies. Michigan has also adopted an industry-specific credit-invoice VAT, however the targeted industry is the retail gasoline trade. The valuation method is objective, rather than subjective. In valuing supplies objectively rather than subjectively, the Michigan VAT resembles the exception provisions that are found in most VATs around the globe. Objective valuations are used in VATs when dealing with inherently problematical transaction types. The central point is that Michigan, like New York, has departed from the traditional American approach of taxing consumption in a single stage (directly from the consumer through a retail sales tax). Michigan is doing this because it wants to capture the administrative benefits of utilizing a multi-stage levy. What New York and Michigan are interested in securing is: a larger and more stable and revenue flow through the VAT’s fractioned payment mechanism, and a more easily audited tax regime through a leveraging of the VAT’s self-enforcement mechanisms.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.