Abstract

Neonates, particularly premature babies, are often managed with endotracheal intubation and subsequent mechanical ventilation to maintain adequate pulmonary gas exchange. There is no consensus on the standard length of endotracheal tube. Although a short tube reduces resistance and respiratory dead space, it is believed to increase the risk of accidental extubation. There are not entirely coherent data regarding the effect of endotracheal tube length on work of breathing in infants. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of neonatal endotracheal tube diameter and length on the work of breathing using an infant in vitro lung model. We assessed the work of breathing index and mechanical ventilation settings with various endotracheal tube diameters and lengths using the JTR100 invitro infant lung model. The basic parameters of the model were breathing frequency of 20 per minutes, inspiratory-expiratory ratio of 1:3, and positive end-expiratory pressure of 5cmH2 O. In addition, the diaphragm driving pressure to maintain the set tidal volume was measured as the work of breathing index. The JTR100 was connected to the Babylog 8000plus through the endotracheal tube. Finally, we monitored the peak inspiratory pressure generated during assist-control volume guarantee mode with a targeted tidal volume of 10-30mL. The diaphragm driving pressure using a 2.0-mm inner diameter tube was twice as high as that using a 4.0-mm inner diameter tube. To maintain the targeted tidal volume, a shorter tube reduced both the diaphragm driving pressure and ventilator-generated peak inspiratory pressure. The difference in the generated peak inspiratory pressure between the shortest and longest tubes was 5cmH2 O. In our infant lung model, a shorter tube resulted in a lower work of breathing and lower ventilator-generated peak inspiratory pressure.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.