Abstract
ABSTRACT Reading is fundamental to academic success, but international reading surveys indicate current pedagogy fails a fifth of adolescents, disproportionately from lower-socioeconomic groups. This UK, mixed-method study evaluated the impact of two whole-text reading approaches on comprehension, using standardised tests. Twenty teachers of English and 413 students (12–13 years) participated, 44% defined as ‘struggling readers’, in parallel classes per school, matched for reading ability. Both groups read two ‘challenging’ novels consecutively over 12 weeks. Ten teachers received no further treatment; ten teachers received training on reading-comprehension pedagogies. The mean comprehension for all students increased by 8.5 months with no significant differential effect of training condition. However, there was a significant differential effect between ‘struggling’ and ‘average+’ readers in both conditions: struggling readers’ mean comprehension improved by 16 months. Required to read whole texts, teachers in both groups altered practice, increasing print exposure, comprehension-strategies and supportive discourse-strategies, benefiting ‘struggling’ over ‘average+’ readers. This pilot study reframes understandings of ‘independent’ reading for struggling readers, indicating that the teaching of whole texts and extended reading must happen in classrooms, not outside.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
