Abstract
Empirical and methodological issues arising when the Cox test statistic for non-nested models is used to test the probit vs. logit specifications are discussed. As an example, the models in Bardasi and Monfardini (European University Institute Working Paper ECO No. 97/9, 1997) for the occupational choice by Italian workers among the private, public and self-employed options is considered. Different versions of the test are compared. The bootstrap technique is then used to control for the actual properties of the test. The results indicate the probit to be the more adequate model, providing evidence against the independence of the irrelevant alternatives assumption imposed by the logit formulation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.