Abstract

We examined the cost of reproduction in high-Arctic barnacle geese (Branta leucopsis Bechstein) by manipulating the length of the incubation period by ± 5 days. Unmanipulated clutches were used as controls. Nests with prolonged incubation suffered a higher egg loss to predators than control nests and nests with shortened incubation. Among females with prolonged incubation, body condition at hatching was significant lower than among females with shortened incubation. These, however, did not increase their feeding effort to compensate for mass loss. Increased levels of parental effort did not affect adult return rate or date of arrival to the breeding ground the following season. Accordingly, there is no evidence from this study that barnacle geese invest in young at the expense of their own survival or future fecundity. We propose that breeding females retain some reserves at the end of laying in order to (i) incubate more continuously, thus shortening the incubation period and minimizing the risk of egg predation, and/or (ii) have a buffer against weight loss due to increased energy expenditure during inclement weather.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.