An evaluation of oral-fluid collection devices for the determination of rubella antibody status in a rural Ethiopian community

Abstract

We compared 3 different oral-fluid collection devices to assess their suitability for use in community studies of rubella antibody. Of 58 individuals enrolled from 13 households from a southern Ethiopian village, 38 provided a blood sample and oral fluids by the 3 devices: 2 proprietary, Omni-SAL and OraSure, and a third a polystyrene sponge swab (Sponge). The Sponge swab, used like a toothbrush, was most acceptable to survey staff and to participants of all ages, although it proved ill-adapted for fluid extraction. The other devices more often caused participant discomfort or anxiety, particularly in the young. Statistical comparison of rubella-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) G in oral fluid, measured by antibody-capture radio-immunoassay, and in serum, by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, showed no clear differences between the devices in oral-fluid performance. Specificity range was 75–100% and sensitivity 73–85%, relative to serum. Specific-antibody levels declined with increasing age, with concomitant decreases in sensitivity, as previously documented. The relationship between specific IgG and total IgG in oral fluid differed by device. Specific IgG levels were highly correlated between paired samples using the Sponge device. We consider the Sponge device to be the most suitable for community survey work, although the extraction method requires improvement. Further work is needed to improve the sensitivity of antibody status determination in adults.