Abstract
Two salient but previously unacknowledged aspects of open-field testing involve contact with a potential predator, as a consequence of placement in the open field by a human, and separation from imprinted companions. As a result we propose that open-field behaviour in chickens ( Gallus gallus) represents a compromise between opposing tendencies to reinstate contact with conspecifics and minimize detection in the face of possible predation. Five experiments were conducted to test various implications of this model. Manipulations designed to enhance the predatory overtones of open-field testing were found to postpone reinstatement behaviours (e.g. distress calling and escape attempts) and prolong behaviours that serve to minimize detection (e.g freezing). Unlike the more traditional view of open-field behaviour as an index of general emotionality, our model suggests that the principal reason for movement is based on attempts to reinstate social contact. In support of the model, birds tested in the presence of cagemates showed significantly longer durations of freezing than those tested individually. The same was true for birds maintained in social isolation for two days prior to testing. The applicability of this approach to conceptualizing the behaviour of chickens in the open field is discussed, and the supposed relationship between fear and distress calling is critically evaluated.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.