Abstract
Phonological access is an important component in theories and models of word reading. However, phonological regularity and consistency effects are not clearly separable in alphabetic writing systems. We investigated these effects in Chinese, where the two variables are operationally distinct. In this orthographic system, regularity is defined as the congruence between the pronunciation of a complex character (or phonogram), and that of its phonetic radical, while phonological consistency indexes the proportion of orthographic neighbors that share the same pronunciation as the phonogram. In the current investigation, regularity and consistency were contrasted in an event-related potential (ERP) study using a lexical decision (LD) task and a delayed naming (DN) task with native Chinese readers. ERP results showed that effects of regularity occurred early after stimulus onset and were long-lasting. Regular characters elicited larger N170, smaller P200, and larger N400 compared to irregular characters. In contrast, significant effects of consistency were only seen at the P200 and consistent characters showed a greater P200 than inconsistent characters. Thus, both the time course and the direction of the effects indicated that regularity and consistency operated under different mechanisms and were distinct constructs. Additionally, both of these phonological effects were only found in the DN task and absent in LD, suggesting that phonological access was non-obligatory for LD. The study demonstrated cross-language variability in how phonological information was accessed from print and how task demands could influence this process.
Highlights
All writing systems carry phonological information, but they vary in the nature of correspondence between orthographic units, e.g., whole word, sublexical components, and phonological units, e.g., phonemes, rimes, syllables
The current investigation examined the independence of regularity and consistency effects during Chinese character recognition www.frontiersin.org using behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) measures, and how access to phonological information may be affected by task demands employing lexical decision (LD) and delayed naming (DN) tasks
It differed from previous reports in that both ortho-phonological effects were studied using ERPs and the patterns of these effects were contrasted between a task explicitly requiring phonological access and one without
Summary
All writing systems carry phonological information, but they vary in the nature of correspondence between orthographic units, e.g., whole word, sublexical components, and phonological units, e.g., phonemes, rimes, syllables. The regularity of a word is determined by whether its pronunciation conforms to grapheme-phoneme correspondence (GPC) rules of the language (e.g., regular words such as raid, pink vs irregular words such as pint, have; Coltheart et al, 1993, 2001), while the consistency of a word depends on the strength of spelling-sound connections derived from the properties of the pronunciations of the “body” of other spelled words (e.g., consistent words such as bust, dust, gust, just, lust, must, rust vs inconsistent words such as cost, host, lost, most, post; Seidenberg and McClelland, 1989; Plaut et al, 1996).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
