An environmental cost–benefit analysis of organic and non-organic dairy and beef production in Iceland
An environmental cost–benefit analysis of organic and non-organic dairy and beef production in Iceland
- Research Article
26
- 10.1089/fpd.2008.0181
- Jun 1, 2009
- Foodborne pathogens and disease
The review's objective was to identify, evaluate, and summarize the findings of all primary research published in English or French, investigating prevalence of zoonotic or potentially zoonotic bacteria, bacterial resistance to antimicrobials, and somatic cell count (SCC) in organic dairy production, or comparing organic and conventional dairy production, using a systematic review methodology. Among 47 studies included in the review, 32 comparison studies were suitable for quality assessment. Fifteen studies were not assessed for quality, due to their descriptive nature or a low sample size (n <or= 2 farms). Overall, bacterial outcomes were reported in 17 studies, and prevalence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and multidrug resistance (MDR) of zoonotic or potentially zoonotic bacteria in 12 and 7 studies, respectively. Campylobacter spp., Escherichia coli including Shiga toxin-producing strains, Salmonella spp., Staphylococcus aureus, and SCC were investigated in 2, 7, 4, 6, and 15 studies, respectively. Contradictory findings were reported for differences in bacterial outcomes and SCC between dairy production types (organic vs. conventional). Lower prevalence of AMR on organic dairy farms was reported more consistently in studies conducted in the United States, as opposed to those conducted in Europe. These conflicting findings may result from geographic differences in organic production regulations governing antimicrobial usage, use of antimicrobials in conventional dairy production, and baseline prevalence, as well as laboratory methods, study designs, or methods of analysis employed. The majority (four of seven) of MDR investigations reported no significant differences in prevalence. Overall, only 9 of 32 studies met all five methodological soundness criteria. More well designed, executed, and reported primary research is needed at the farm and post-farm levels.
- Research Article
5
- 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113195
- Jun 29, 2023
- Food Research International
Potential associations between organic dairy products, gut microbiome, and gut health: A review
- Research Article
8
- 10.3168/jds.2019-16900
- Apr 29, 2020
- Journal of Dairy Science
Possibilities for a specific breeding program for organic dairy production
- Research Article
50
- 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.07.027
- Jul 17, 2009
- Food Chemistry
Concentrations of phytanic acid and pristanic acid are higher in organic than in conventional dairy products from the German market
- Book Chapter
6
- 10.5772/53150
- Nov 7, 2012
“Healthy Food” from Healthy Cows
- Research Article
54
- 10.2134/jeq2008.0445
- Sep 1, 2009
- Journal of Environmental Quality
Organic dairy production has increased rapidly in recent years. Organic dairy cows (Bos taurus) generally eat different diets than their conventional counterparts. Although these differences could impact availability, utilization, and cycling of manure nutrients, little such information is available to aid organic dairy farmers in making nutrient and manure management decisions. In this study, we comparatively characterized P in organic and conventional dairy manure using solution and solid state (31)P NMR spectroscopic techniques. Phosphorus in both types of dairy manure was extracted with water, Na acetate buffer (100 mmol L(-1), pH 5.0) plus 20 mg Na dithionite mL(-1), or 0.025 mol L(-1) NaOH with 50 mmolL(-1) EDTA. Solution NMR analysis revealed that organic dairy manure contained about 10% more inorganic phosphate than conventional dairy manure. Whereas organic dairy manure did contain slightly more phytate P, it contained 30 to 50% less monoester P than conventional dairy manure. Solid state NMR spectroscopy revealed that mono-, di-, and trivalent metal P species with different stabilities were present in the two dairy manures. Conventional dairy manure contained relatively higher contents of soluble inorganic P species and stable metal phytate species. In contrast, organic dairy manure contained more Ca and Mg species of P. These results indicate that P transformation rates and quantities should be expected to differ between organic and conventional dairy manures.
- Research Article
1
- 10.3733/001c.120614
- Jun 28, 2024
- California Agriculture
Abstract: Colostrum feeding provides immunoglobulins, in a process called transfer of passive immunity, which is critical for dairy calf health and welfare. However, failure of transfer of passive immunity (FTPI) occurs in about 12% of calves nationwide. This study compares the prevalence of FTPI between calves raised on organic and conventional dairy farms, describes the colostral management practices on organic dairy farms in California, and recommends improvements. We compared serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentrations between calves raised on organic and conventional dairies and found that the odds of FTPI in calves raised in organic dairies were 2.5 times greater than in calves raised in conventional dairies. Focusing on varied practices in organic dairies, FTPI was 2.9 times more likely in calves fed less than 4 liters of colostrum within the first 24 hours, compared to calves fed more than that amount. We also found that organic dairy producers did not routinely monitor colostral IgG concentrations and passive immunity status. We recommend that organic dairy farmers adopt these practices to decrease the prevalence of FTPI in calves.
- Research Article
25
- 10.3168/jds.2019-17232
- Dec 19, 2019
- Journal of Dairy Science
Symposium review: Comparisons of feed and milk nitrogen efficiency and carbon emissions in organic versus conventional dairy production systems
- Research Article
37
- 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.06.022
- Aug 14, 2009
- Livestock Science
Fertility, somatic cell count and milk production in Swedish organic and conventional dairy herds
- Research Article
16
- 10.1007/s13165-012-0025-8
- Mar 1, 2012
- Organic Agriculture
Veterinarians, as opposed to other professionals, have been accused of being unduly critical to animal welfare in organic farming. A nationwide questionnaire (QuestBack™) was distributed to 400 Norwegian production animal veterinarians and 400 agricultural dairy advisors to compare attitudes and opinions on calf health and welfare in organic dairy farming. The response rate was 52 % for veterinarians and 54 % for advisors. In direct comparison, both groups thought that the calves’ overall health status and well-being did not differ in organic and conventional dairy farming systems. However, a significant number of both veterinarians and advisors considered the calves’ confidence in people and space allowance to be better in organic dairy herds compared with conventional dairy herds, whereas feed quality was regarded to be poorer. When asked in more depth about organic dairy farming, the majority of respondents considered the routine of keeping calves with their mothers and the good care of the calves by stockpersons as important welfare advantages. Among all factors related to health, welfare, morbidity and mortality, low calf mortality and adequate treatment of disease and injury received the best scores. Body condition and growth, as well as the use of calf health recording cards, received the worst scores. The two professions differed in their views on the most important welfare challenges for calves in an organic environment: while both groups agreed on poor feed quality, veterinarians indicated concern for inadequate disease treatment while advisors pointed to poor hygiene. Results from the questionnaire indicated that the participants’ familiarity with organic standards was relatively poor, especially among the less-experienced professionals. In conclusion, the view that veterinarians are more sceptical towards animal health and welfare in organic production compared with other professionals is not supported. The few differences found between the two groups may reflect different emphases due to their education and focus, e.g. treatment of disease versus advice on feeding, rather than different attitudes to organic farming. Future efforts should address the possible challenges and shortcomings in organic calf production found in the current study.
- Research Article
21
- 10.2134/jeq2011.0226
- May 1, 2012
- Journal of Environmental Quality
Organic dairy production has exhibited potential for growth in the United States dairy sector. However, little information is available on whether there is any difference in manure composition and quality between organic (OD) and conventional (CD) dairy manure even though the composition and quality are important parameters with respect to availability, utilization, and cycling of manure nutrients and environmental impact evaluation. We comparatively characterized whole and water-extracted materials of 15 OD and seven CD dairy manure samples by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and fluorescence spectroscopies. Fourier transform infrared features of manure organic matter varied mainly in the 1650 to 1550 cm range, reflecting the presence of different N compounds in these manure samples. Fluorescence data revealed five fluorophore components present in the water-extracted organic matter from the manures. We found no clearly distinct value ranges in whole and water-extractable organic matter between the two types of dairy manure with respect to C and N contents and FT-IR and fluorescence spectral features. However, based on the average values, we observed general pattern differences on the effect of organic farming on the manure composition: OD contained less soluble C and N compounds on dry weight basis but more hydrophobic aliphatic groups in whole manure. The soluble organic matter in OD samples contained more stable humic- and lignin-related components and less amino/protein N-related components based on their spectroscopic features. These differences might be attributed to more forage feedstuffs in organic dairy farming management and more protein additives in conventional dairy feedstuffs. Information from this work may be useful in aiding organic dairy farmers in making manure management decisions.
- Research Article
8
- 10.1111/1750-3841.15720
- May 1, 2021
- Journal of Food Science
The United States regulates the use of antibiotics in agricultural settings to address the global antibiotic resistance problem. Conventional dairy cows treated with antibiotics are kept in the herd and after the withholding period milk is harvested. On organic farms, the US organic standard on antibiotic use requires sick dairy cows to be treated, but treated cows must be removed from the herd and their milk can never again be sold as certified organic. This study investigated the US public's perceptions of the organic dairy farming, antibiotic use on dairy farms, and whether these perceptions affect consumer's self‐reported purchasing behavior for organic. We used a nationally representative phone‐based survey of 1000 US adults and characterized participants’ self‐reported (i) knowledge of the legality of antibiotic use on dairy farms (conventional and organic) and (ii) frequency of purchasing organic instead of conventional dairy products, as well as several demographic and other variables. The results indicated that participants’ knowledge about antibiotic use practices in dairy farming have no effect on their self‐reported purchasing behavior for organic or conventional dairy products. However, respondents who were familiar with the regulations of antibiotic use on dairy farms were more likely to oppose the US organic standard on antibiotic use in dairy farming and thought that past antibiotic use should not permanently remove a cow's organic status. These findings contribute to understanding of public perceptions that shape the US dairy organic market.Practical ApplicationIncome, employment, health and political values, but not consumers’ knowledge about antibiotic use in dairy farming, affect self‐reported purchasing behavior for organic dairy products. However, consumers who are familiar with the regulations of antibiotic use on US dairy farms disagree with the US organic standard on antibiotic use mandating loss of organic status for any cattle treated with antibiotics. These findings may be useful to organic markets.
- Research Article
193
- 10.1016/s0308-521x(98)00004-3
- Aug 1, 1998
- Agricultural Systems
Energy utilization in crop and dairy production in organic and conventional livestock production systems
- Research Article
- 10.1007/s13165-025-00499-4
- Mar 26, 2025
- Organic Agriculture
As public criticism of the management of surplus dairy calves increases, new approaches are required to improve calf welfare to maintain the dairy industry’s license to produce. Little is known about consumers’ willingness to buy (WTB) organic dairy and meat products from farms that aim to improve the welfare of surplus dairy calves. This study aims to address this research gap by identifying potential target groups for assessing the market potential of these products in south-west Germany. For this purpose, an online survey was conducted among 922 participants in this region. Participants were presented with one of three scenarios describing different rearing systems for dairy calves that hold the potential to provide enhanced calf welfare in comparison to current dairy farming practices: Cow-calf contact, the use of dual-purpose breeds and on-farm slaughter. Factor and cluster analyses were performed to identify potential target groups for organic dairy and meat products from these “calf-friendly” rearing systems. The four clusters Conscious organic shoppers, Moderate sustainability advocates, The indifferent consumers and the Interested organic refusers were identified. The findings indicate that organic consumers who care about calf welfare and prioritize product quality and sustainability when buying food are a promising target group for products from “calf-friendly” organic dairy farms. Consumers’ WTB seems to depend more on their general attitudes and financial means than on the presented scenarios. By identifying a potential target group for these products, this study fills a research gap and may contribute to more effective and targeted marketing.
- Research Article
- 10.1016/s0308-521x(97)89826-5
- Jun 1, 1997
- Agricultural Systems
Systems-orientated research in agriculture and rural development: Papers from an International Symposium, Montpellier, France, 21–25 November 1994. Edited under the direction of Michel Sebillotte. CIRAD-SAR, Montpellier, France, 1995, pp 1006. Price: not given. ISBN 2 87614 181 7
- Ask R Discovery
- Chat PDF
AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.