An effect size statistical framework for investigating sexual dimorphism in non-avian dinosaurs and other extinct taxa

Models of sexual selection predict that females use ornament size to evaluate male condition. It has also been suggested that ornament asymmetry provides females with accurate information about condition. To test these ideas we experimentally manipulated condition in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni, by varying the amount of food available to developing larvae. Males of this species have greatly exaggerated eyestalk length and females prefer to mate with males with wider eyespans. Our experiments show that male ornaments (eyestalks) display a disproportionate sensitivity to condition compared with the homologous character in females, and to non-sexual traits (wing dimensions). In contrast, in neither sex did asymmetry reflect condition either in sexual ornaments or in non-sexual traits. We conclude that ornament size is likely to play a far greater role in sexual selection as an indicator of individual condition than does asymmetry.

Sexual Selection and Variance in Reproductive Success

The relative roles of natural and sexual selection in promoting evolutionary lineage divergence remains controversial and difficult to assess in natural systems. Local adaptation through natural selection is known to play a central role in promoting evolutionary divergence, yet secondary sexual traits can vary widely among species in recent radiations, suggesting that sexual selection may also be important in the early stages of speciation. Here, we compare rates of divergence in ecologically relevant traits (morphology) and sexually selected signalling traits (coloration) relative to neutral structure in genome-wide molecular markers and examine patterns of variation in sexual dichromatism to explore the roles of natural and sexual selection in the diversification of the songbird genus Junco (Aves: Passerellidae). Juncos include divergent lineages in Central America and several dark-eyed junco (J.hyemalis) lineages that diversified recently as the group recolonized North America following the last glacial maximum (ca. 18,000years ago). We found an accelerated rate of divergence in sexually selected characters relative to ecologically relevant traits. Moreover, sexual dichromatism measurements suggested a positive relationship between the degree of colour divergence and the strength of sexual selection when controlling for neutral genetic distance. We also found a positive correlation between dichromatism and latitude, which coincides with the geographic axis of decreasing lineage age in juncos but also with a steep ecological gradient. Finally, we found significant associations between genome-wide variants linked to functional genes and proxies of both sexual and natural selection. These results suggest that the joint effects of sexual and ecological selection have played a prominent role in the junco radiation.

The (mis)concept of species recognition

The theory of sexual selection is the most widely accepted theory explaining the evolution of mating systems and secondary sexual characters. Polygyny is the most common mating system in mammals, and there is a strong correlation between the degree of polygyny and the degree of sexual size dimorphism skewed towards males. Sexual selection theory posits that polygyny in mammals has evolved through direct, precopulatory, intrasexual selection in males, and that sexual size dimorphism is a result of male competition for mates. New results that are being obtained with the use of molecular techniques and with comparative phylogenetic methods do not appear to support predictions from this classical model in full. In this article, an expansion of the classical model is presented that combines the effects of at least four forms of selection: natural, precopulatory intrasexual, postcopulatory intrasexual, and intersexual selection. This mixed model consists of an initial phase in which natural selection operates on body size, followed by a second phase dominated by sexual selection and involving increases in sexual dimorphism and coercive behaviour of males towards females. Sexual harassment induces female aggregation, thus creating social potential for polygyny. Males compete for access to the groups of females, following two possible evolutionary scenarios, directional or equilibrium sexual selection, both producing similar behavioural polygyny, but with differences in the intensity of intra‐male precopulatory sexual selection. Predictions of the mixed model are as follows: 1) polygyny can exist without high variance in male reproductive success (a fundamental requirement in the classical model); 2) extra‐group fertilisation can be common; 3) sexual size dimorphism evolved prior to polygyny; 4) sexual coercion is widespread; and 5) females reduce levels of sexual coercion by joining groups.

Trade-off between resource allocation and acquisition in anadromous adult male Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.)

Since the mid-1970s, most investigators have agreed that the ‘bizarre’ structures (here referred to as ‘exaggerated’ structures) of dinosaurs – for example, the horns and frills of ceratopsids, the crests of lambeosaurine hadrosaurids, the domes of pachycephalosaurs – functioned first and foremost as signalling and combat structures used in mate competition (Farlow D Hopson, 1975; Molnar, 1977; Spassov, 1979; Ostrom & Wellnhoffer, 1986; Sampson, 1997, 2001; Dodson, Forster & Sampson, 2004). Padian & Horner (2010) argue that the mate competition hypothesis is not supported by available evidence, citing in particular the lack of data documenting sexual dimorphism within dinosaur species. In place of the mate competition model, they present a challenging and novel alternative, suggesting these traits functioned as species recognition features for identifying conspecifics, thereby facilitating social interactions such as herding, mating and parental care. Padian & Horner offer a pair of tests for distinguishing paleontological examples of exaggerated traits evolving under the influence of species recognition from those resulting primarily from sexual selection. The first test relates to the patterns of diversification of exaggerated structures, predicted to be random under the influence of species recognition and directional if driven by sexual selection. The second test invokes evidence of geographic overlap of closely related, contemporaneous species, thought to be a necessary condition for the evolution of exaggerated structures under the influence of species recognition (in part so as to avoid unwanted matings). These authors argue that known examples of exaggerated structures among dinosaurs pass both of these tests, indicating that species recognition is the preferred (though not necessarily sole) explanation. Padian & Horner highlight a major problem common to most previous studies addressing the function of dinosaurian exaggerated structures – lack of phylogenetic context. Comprehensive testing of adaptation hypotheses requires mapping of relevant characters onto independently derived phylogenies in order to search for evidence of evolutionary assembly of the purported adaptation. They also underline the importance of assessing the full range of alternative hypotheses as rigorously as possible, rather than accepting one explanation as the default. We fully support both of these contentions. Nevertheless, we disagree with several of the paper’s central conclusions, including: (1) the necessary correlation of overt sexual dimorphism and sexual selection; (2) the required linkage between sexual selection with a directional pattern of diversification; (3) evidence for the geographical overlap of multiple closely related dinosaur taxa bearing exaggerated structures. In addition to countering these claims, we propose two alternative predictions that allow putative species recognition traits to be distinguished from sexually selected ones. With regard to the exaggerated structures of dinosaurs, the species recognition hypothesis fails both of these tests, and the sexual selection hypothesis remains by far the best-supported explanation. Citing Darwin (1871), Padian & Horner claim that sexual dimorphism is effectively the sine qua non of sexual selection. They argue further that the apparent absence of sexual dimorphism in dinosaurian exaggerated characters is Journal of Zoology

Allometric relationships in primary sexual traits (male and female genitalia), secondary sexual traits (male horns and female carinae), and non-sex-related traits (external body traits, epipharynx traits) were studied in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Model II regressions of log-transformed data were used to quantify relationships, with pronotum width as regressor and indicator of overall body size. Slopes (allometric values) for the different trait categories were significantly different, with secondary sexual traits showing the highest values (higher than 1.0), followed by external body traits (slightly lower than 1.00) and epipharynx traits (around 0.2). Primary sexual traits and body size were mostly uncorrelated and genital sizes were virtually constant. Allometries of secondary sexual traits were quite different in the two sexes: the relationship between male horn length and pronotum width was approximately sigmoidal, while that between female carina length and pronotum width was linear. External body traits had significantly higher allometric values in females than in males. Our results suggest that traits in the different categories are under different kinds of selection. Genital allometries can be explained on the basis of sexual selection by cryptic female choice or by the lock-and-key hypothesis. Among secondary sexual characters, male horn morphology seems to be mostly "environmentally" determined and sexual selection would affect only a component of the developmental mechanism of horn expression. External body characters are likely under natural selection, even though a few traits could be sex-related. Finally, in both sexes, internal epipharynx traits seem to be subject to the same selective pressure, probably because males and females use the same feeding niche. The constancy of genital sizes in O. taurus suggests that in developmental processes, more is invested in primary sexual traits (to produce genitalia of the proper size) than in secondary sexual or body traits. Males receiving low quantities of food may incur costs associated with a small horn or small body size, but do not incur costs associated with small genitalia. Females probably share the same developmental pattern.

Secondary sexual traits increase male fitness, but may be maladaptive in females, generating intralocus sexual conflict that is ameliorated through sexual dimorphism. Sexual selection on males may also lead some males to avoid expenditure on secondary sexual traits and achieve copulations using alternative reproductive tactics (ARTs). Secondary sexual traits can increase or decrease fitness in males, depending on which ART they employ, generating intralocus tactical conflict that can be ameliorated through male dimorphism. Due to the evolutionary forces acting against intralocus sexual and tactical conflicts, male dimorphism could coevolve with sexual dimorphism, a hypothesis that we tested by investigating these dimorphisms across 48 harvestman species. Using three independently derived phylogenies, we consistently found that the evolution of sexual dimorphism was correlated with that of male dimorphism, and suggest that the major force behind this relationship is the similarity between selection against intralocus sexual conflict and selection against intralocus tactical conflict. We also found that transitions in male dimorphism were more likely in the presence of sexual dimorphism, indicating that if a sexually selected trait arises on an autosome and is expressed in both sexes, its suppression in females probably evolves earlier than its suppression in small males that adopt ARTs.

In most animals, females are larger than males. Paradoxically, sexual size dimorphism is biased towards males in most mammalian species. An accepted explanation is that sexual dimorphism in mammals evolved by intramale sexual selection. I tested this hypothesis in primates, by relating sexual size dimorphism to seven proxies of sexual selection intensity: operational sex ratio, mating system, intermale competition, group sex ratio, group size, maximum mating percentage (percentage of observed copulations involving the most successful male), and total paternity (a genetic estimate of the percentage of young sired by the most successful male). I fitted phylogenetic generalised least squares models using sexual size dimorphism as the dependent variable and each of the seven measures of intensity of sexual selection as independent variables. I conducted this comparative analysis with data from 50 extant species of primates, including Homo sapiens, Pan troglodytes, and Gorilla spp. Sexual dimorphism was positively related to the four measures of female monopolisation (operational sex ratio, mating system, intermale competition, and group sex ratio) and in some cases to group size, but was not associated with maximum mating percentage or total paternity. Additional regression analyses indicated that maximum mating percentage and total paternity were negatively associated with group size. These results are predicted by reproductive skew theory: in large groups, males can lose control of the sexual behaviour of the other members of the group or can concede reproductive opportunities to others. The results are also consistent with the evolution of sexual size dimorphism before polygyny, due to the effects of natural, rather than sexual, selection. In birds, the study of molecular paternity showed that variance in male reproductive success is much higher than expected by behaviour. In mammals, recent studies have begun to show the opposite trend, i.e. that intensity of sexual selection is lower than expected by polygyny. Results of this comparative analysis of sexual size dimorphism and sexual selection intensity in primates suggest that the use of intramale sexual selection theory to explain the evolution of polygyny and sexual dimorphism in mammals should be reviewed, and that natural selection should be considered alongside sexual selection as an evolutionary driver of sexual size dimorphism and polygyny in mammals.

Sexual selection is generally held responsible for the exceptional diversity in secondary sexual traits in animals. Mating system evolution is therefore expected to profoundly affect the covariation between secondary sexual traits and mating success. Whereas there is such evidence at the interspecific level, data within species remain scarce. We here investigate sexual selection acting on the exaggerated male fore femur and the male wing in the common and widespread dung flies Sepsis punctum and S.neocynipsea (Diptera: Sepsidae). Both species exhibit intraspecific differences in mating systems and variation in sexual size dimorphism (SSD) across continents that correlates with the extent of male-male competition. We predicted that populations subject to increased male-male competition will experience stronger directional selection on the sexually dimorphic male foreleg. Our results suggest that fore femur size, width and shape were indeed positively associated with mating success in populations with male-biased SSD in both species, which was not evident in conspecific populations with female-biased SSD. However, this was also the case for wing size and shape, a trait often assumed to be primarily under natural selection. After correcting for selection on overall body size by accounting for allometric scaling, we found little evidence for independent selection on any of these size or shape traits in legs or wings, irrespective of the mating system. Sexual dimorphism and (foreleg) trait exaggeration is therefore unlikely to be driven by direct precopulatory sexual selection, but more so by selection on overall size or possibly selection on allometric scaling.

A standard example of directional asymmetry with one side of the body having a larger character value than the other is testes size in many vertebrates. The relation between directional asymmetry in testes size and the expression of secondary sexual characters (a measure of phenotypic quality) in two bird species, the barn swallow, Hirundo rustica, and the house sparrow, Passer domesticus, was used to test whether directional asymmetry was subject to directional selection. Testes size, which was positively related to the size of the secondary sexual character, demonstrated directional asymmetry, with the left testis generally being larger than the right testis. The amount of directional asymmetry was positively related to the expression of the secondary sexual character, suggesting that males with the largest degree of directional asymmetry were at a selective advantage, since males with the most extravagant secondary sexual characters have the highest mating success. These relations were not confounded by variables such as body mass, body size and age. Males in poor condition (with small secondary sexual characters) may be unable to develop large degrees of directional asymmetry, and deviations from directional asymmetry may therefore be viewed as a measure of developmental homeostasis.

The demonstration of sexual dimorphism in the fossil record can provide vital information about the role that sexual selection has played in the evolution of life. However, statistically robust inferences of sexual dimorphism in fossil organisms are exceedingly difficult to establish, owing to issues of sample size, experimental control, and methodology. This is particularly so in the case of dinosaurs, for which sexual dimorphism has been posited in many species, yet quantifiable data are often lacking. This study presents the first statistical investigation of sexual dimorphism across Dinosauria. It revisits prior analyses that purport to find quantitative evidence for sexual dimorphism in nine dinosaur species. After the available morphological data were subjected to a suite of statistical tests (normality and unimodality tests and mixture modeling), no evidence for sexual dimorphism was found in any of the examined taxa, contrary to conventional wisdom. This is not to say that dinosaurs were not sexually dimorphic (phylogenetic inference suggests they may well have been), only that the available evidence precludes its detection. A priori knowledge of the sexes would greatly facilitate the assessment of sexual dimorphism in the fossil record, and it is suggested that unambiguous indicators of sex (e.g., presence of eggs, embryos, medullary bone) be used to this end.

Sexual dimorphism in body size and leg length was investigated in a common orb-weaving spider of Ireland and northern Europe, Metellina segmentata (Clerck, 1757) (Araneae, Metidae). Univariate and multivariate analyses of sexual dimorphism revealed that a greater proportion of between sex variation (sexual dimorphism) was attributable to variation in shape than in size. Significant differences were found in the scores for males and females for the first two principal components. PC1 (shape) accounted for 44.25% of the variation and PC2 (size) 13.01% of the variation. Although M. segmentata has been attributed with minimal sexual size dimorphism, females were markedly heavier, possibly a reflection of differential reproductive investment between the sexes, but males had markedly longer legs and broader prosoma. The results are discussed with regard to existing theories of natural and sexual selection, particularly those concerning sexual cannibalism and differential life history traits in males and females. Models that attempt to explain the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in spiders and of the web builders in particular, fail to account for the multivariate nature of dimorphism, especially with respect to shape.

Sexual dimorphism in body size and leg length was investigated in a common orb-weaving spider of Ireland and northern Europe, Metellina segmentata (Clerck, 1757) (Araneae, Metidae). Univariate and multivariate analyses of sexual dimorphism revealed that a greater proportion of between sex variation (sexual dimorphism) was attributable to variation in shape than in size. Significant differences were found in the scores for males and females for the first two principal components. PC1 (shape) accounted for 44.25% of the variation and PC2 (size) 13.01% of the variation. Although M. segmentata has been attributed with minimal sexual size dimorphism, females were markedly heavier, possibly a reflection of differential reproductive investment between the sexes, but males had markedly longer legs and broader prosoma. The results are discussed with regard to existing theories of natural and sexual selection, particularly those concerning sexual cannibalism and differential life history traits in males and females. Models that attempt to explain the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in spiders and of the web builders in particular, fail to account for the multivariate nature of dimorphism, especially with respect to shape.