Abstract
Historical wind data analysis is a key part of estimating design wind loads. Current design standards do not separately consider the wind loading effects by different wind hazard types. One reason for this lack of consideration is that the separation between thunderstorm and non-thunderstorm wind data is still an issue. A previous study about the Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS) provided a classification method of wind data as thunderstorm or non-thunderstorm based on thunderstorm ‘flags’ (Lombardo et al., 2009). However, this method relies mainly on manual or automated weather observations which are limited to a subset of stations worldwide. This paper first develops a revised wind hazard type recognition method based on a neural network. In this method, the historical wind data recorded is segmented in different time domains to be applied in a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) for an automated thunderstorm (T) or non-thunderstorm (NT) classification. Also, based on the trained 1D-CNN, a more comprehensive wind database can be extracted. The classification result from ASOS can automatically provide different peak wind speed for different wind hazard types.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.