Abstract

Previous research has shown that the visual system is important for rats to establish the arm preference in the elevated plus maze (EPM), an animal model of anxiety. This study aims at evaluating whether a gradient of illumination between the enclosed arms of the maze (E/E ΔLux) could be a reliable approach to detect drugs-induced harmful effect on visual discrimination of rats. Four EPM configurations with different E/E ΔLux (8, 41 and 85 lx) were used to demonstrate that as E/E ΔLux increases, rats avoid to explore the light enclosed arm, which characterizes the animal ability to discriminate the most illuminated area within the protected environment of the maze. The establishment of either 41 or 85 E/E ΔLux failed to alter the traditional spatial–temporal variables in the EPM. In addition, systemic treatment with midazolam (MDZ; 1.0 mg kg −1, a classical anxiolytic) induced anxiolysis in rats tested in 41 and 85 E/E ΔLux EPM, with no change in the visual discrimination, when evaluated by the level of light enclosed arm exploration. Systemic treatment with scopolamine (SCP; 1.0, 2.0 and 8.0 mg kg −1), a drug endowed with harmful properties upon the visual system, did not change either the open arm avoidance or the visual discrimination at the low doses, but induced increased light enclosed arm (visual discrimination deficit) and open arm exploration (anxiolytic like effect) at a higher dose. We propose that the incorporation of an E/E ΔLux in the EPM may reinforce the predict validity of the test since it enables to evaluate whether a visual discrimination deficit can be confounded with an anxiolytic-like effect, thus establishing a false positive detection.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.