Abstract
Many competing geoacoustic models exist to represent sandy sediments. In this work, Bayesian inference is employed to compare the sensitivity of the physical input parameters of three competing models: the viscous grain shearing model of Buckingham, the Biot-Stoll model, and the extended Biot model of Chotiros, using previously taken wave speed and attenuation laboratory measurements. Bayesian model selection techniques are then employed to assess the degree to which the predictions of these models can be used to explain the observed data. Since all three geoacoustic models require a large number of input parameters and many of these input parameters are difficult to measure, a main goal of this work is to use Bayesian techniques to determine which parameters can be resolved via inversion and what kinds of data are required for parameter resolution. [Work supported by ONR, Ocean Acoustics.]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.