Abstract

Previous literature has compared the performance of existing ground point classification (GPC) techniques on airborne LiDAR (ALS) data (LiDAR—light detection and ranging); however, their performance when applied to terrestrial LiDAR (TLS) data has not yet been addressed. This research tested the classification accuracy of five openly-available GPC algorithms on seven TLS datasets: Zhang et al.’s inverted cloth simulation (CSF), Kraus and Pfeiffer’s hierarchical weighted robust interpolation classifier (HWRI), Axelsson’s progressive TIN densification filter (TIN), Evans and Hudak’s multiscale curvature classification (MCC), and Vosselman’s modified slope-based filter (MSBF). Classification performance was analyzed using the kappa index of agreement (KIA) and rasterized spatial distribution of classification accuracy datasets generated through comparisons with manually classified reference datasets. The results identified a decrease in classification accuracy for the CSF and HWRI classification of low vegetation, for the HWRI and MCC classifications of variably sloped terrain, for the HWRI and TIN classifications of low outlier points, and for the TIN and MSBF classifications of off-terrain (OT) points without any ground points beneath. Additionally, the results show that while no single algorithm was suitable for use on all datasets containing varying terrain characteristics and OT object types, in general, a mathematical-morphology/slope-based method outperformed other methods, reporting a kappa score of 0.902.

Highlights

  • Raw light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data is represented in a 3D point cloud where each point represents the return of a laser pulse from a reflected surface, be it the ground or any off-terrain (OT) objects situated between the sensor and the ground [1]

  • Current algorithms developed for airborne laser scanners (ALS) ground point classification (GPC) were tested on terrestrial laser scanners (TLS) data

  • Existing comparisons performed on ALS data by Sithole and Vosselman [35] and Meng et al [36] have shown that while choosing an appropriate algorithm for GPC will vary by site, in general, surface-based methods performed the best

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Raw light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data is represented in a 3D point cloud where each point represents the return of a laser pulse from a reflected surface, be it the ground or any off-terrain (OT) objects situated between the sensor and the ground [1]. LiDAR can be used to characterize the ground surface with centimeter-level vertical accuracy [8,9]. LiDAR can be used for pedestrian pathfinding to ensure route accessibility in urban environments [13]. Given this wide range of applications, different LiDAR data collection platforms are often required

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.