Abstract

A common goal in ecology and wildlife management is to determine the causes of variation in population dynamics over long periods of time and across large spatial scales. Many assumptions must nevertheless be overcome to make appropriate inference about spatio-temporal variation in population dynamics, such as autocorrelation among data points, excess zeros, and observation error in count data. To address these issues, many scientists and statisticians have recommended the use of Bayesian hierarchical models. Unfortunately, hierarchical statistical models remain somewhat difficult to use because of the necessary quantitative background needed to implement them, or because of the computational demands of using Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithms to estimate parameters. Fortunately, new tools have recently been developed that make it more feasible for wildlife biologists to fit sophisticated hierarchical Bayesian models (i.e., Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation, ‘INLA’). We present a case study using two important game species in North America, the lesser and greater scaup, to demonstrate how INLA can be used to estimate the parameters in a hierarchical model that decouples observation error from process variation, and accounts for unknown sources of excess zeros as well as spatial and temporal dependence in the data. Ultimately, our goal was to make unbiased inference about spatial variation in population trends over time.

Highlights

  • Monitoring and detecting changes in population abundance, and determining why changes vary over space and time, are concepts that are central to ecology, conservation, and management [1,2]

  • Overall, our results support previous work indicating a decline in population abundance in the northern boreal forest of Canada, and indicate that the population of scaup has increased rapidly in the southeastern prairie parkland region (PPR) since 1957

  • It seems that the most important processes influencing population dynamics were not related to second-order autocorrelation across strata or over time, but rather parameters in the model explicitly accounting for the differences among the strata

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Monitoring and detecting changes in population abundance, and determining why changes vary over space and time, are concepts that are central to ecology, conservation, and management [1,2]. Various sources of uncertainty in data and underlying ecological processes (e.g., temporal or spatial autocorrelation and observation error) can confound inference about changes in population abundance [3]. Hierarchical models may present the best statistical approach for assessing changes in population abundance across large spatial areas [6,7,8]. Hierarchical models are ideal for handling observational data because they allow for the explicit separation of observation and process error [6,9,10]. If spatial autocorrelation is present in the data, but not accounted for, the variance associated with the parameter will be estimated to be smaller than it should be, potentially causing the researcher to conclude that a result is statistically significant when, in reality, it is not [14]

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.