Abstract

High operating costs and complexity of risks are impacting negatively on corporations’ profitability despite practicing corporate governance. Corporate governance requires that the management develops frameworks, structures and guidance to manage enterprise risk. The traditional methods of mitigating risk has relied heavily on insurance as the only mean of protecting enterprise against risks. This is now becoming too expensive for corporations, and, is not able to cover all risk exposures. This forms the basis of the research problem in this study. The purpose and objective of this study is to establish alternative methods of mitigating risks in corporations and, develop models for computing benefits accruing to the corporations as a result of using the new alternative method. As such, this study identifies financial assets, sinking fund, ploughing back of premiums as possible investments where foregone insurance premiums can be invested and, develop a model for computing earnings resulting from such investments. This study applies Actuarial Theory, Financial Theory of Risk Transfer, Modigliani and Miller Theory and Agency Theory, and use both primary and secondary data collected from National Transport and Safety Authority, Kenya and Registrar of Motor vehicles, Kenya target populations, namely number of countries in Europe and North America and the number of insurance companies in Kenya. This study is of significance to the business communities, scholars and researchers, the government and the general public by: (1), providing a better understanding for designing and formulating risk management policy in their organizations, (2), providing mechanism for investing the foregone insurance premium and (3), strengthening knowledge and further research in this area. In summary this study is tenable and a better alternative to ever increasing insurance premiums.

Highlights

  • Business organizations are facing hard economic times due to high operating costs and complex risks

  • This study was based on the following assumptions: (1), the secondary data used in this study present background and situations, which enable the findings of this study to be applied in other countries, and (2), the alternative method and the developed model will apply to other risks that require hedging and mitigation

  • This study has illustrated the viability of employing the new Alternative Method of Mitigating Risk in firms

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Business organizations are facing hard economic times due to high operating costs and complex risks. This paper borrows heavily from corporate governance principles in finding alternative means of managing risk at the lowest possible cost, while increasing firm’s earnings. It borrows from the work of Myron, Menton and Fischer which, according to Buehler, Freeman, and Hulmer (2008) working paper on the Risk Revolution, the search for a better way of managing risk stated in 1940s when academics started to advance on their understanding of risk trade-off in investment management in their publication on option pricing. This according to them was a strategy mainly to manage downside risk

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.