Abstract

Surgery of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has undergone substantial changes during the past years. Until the 1990s, radical nephrectomy together with ipsilateral adrenalectomy was considered the golden standard. Meanwhile it was demonstrated that tumours up to 4 cm in diameter and a normal contralateral kidney can be treated by partial nephrectomy (elective indication) without compromising oncological safety. Development of laparoscopy influenced renal surgery significantly. Currently, laparoscopic nephrectomy is considered a golden standard for renal masses larger than 4 cm (T1b-T2), whereas open radical nephrectomy is reserved for large, locally advanced tumours, caval extension or enlarged lymph nodes. Adrenalectomy can be omitted if the adrenal appears normal. Tumours less than 4 cm should undergo partial nephrectomy. The better renal functional reserve after elective partial compared with radical nephrectomy seems to be associated with better overall survival. For partial nephrectomy the open approach currently remains the golden standard, whereas laparoscopy is reserved for specialized centres.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.