Agroterrorism: Betting Far More than the Farm
Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and ScienceVol. 2, No. 4 Invited PaperAgroterrorism: Betting Far More than the FarmRoger BreezeRoger BreezeSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:5 Jan 2005https://doi.org/10.1089/bsp.2004.2.251AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byRisks of introduction and economic consequences associated with African swine fever, classical swine fever and foot‐and‐mouth disease: A review of the literature14 December 2020 | Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, Vol. 68, No. 4Viruses and BioterrorismStrengthening Biosecurity in Iraq: Development of a National Biorisk Management System26 February 2016 | Frontiers in Public Health, Vol. 4Agroterrorism Targeting Livestock: A Review with a Focus on Early Detection Systems24 August 2013 | Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science, Vol. 11, No. S1The Microbial Rosetta Stone Central Agricultural Database: An Information Resource on High-Consequence Plant PathogensPlant Disease, Vol. 97, No. 8Control of Infectious Bioagents17 December 2012Animal Biowarfare Research: Historical Perspective and Potential Future Attacks31 May 2012 | Zoonoses and Public Health, Vol. 59, No. 8Livestock Agroterrorism: The Deliberate Introduction of a Highly Infectious Animal Pathogen4 October 2012 | Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, Vol. 9, No. 10Macroeconomic costs to large scale disruptions of food production: The case of foot- and-mouth disease in the United StatesEconomic Modelling, Vol. 29, No. 5Xylella fastidiosa: A Model for Analyzing Agricultural Biosecurity22 June 2010 | Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science, Vol. 8, No. 2Model could aid emergency response planning for foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks1 May 2008 | California Agriculture, Vol. 63, No. 3Simulation of foot-and-mouth disease spread within an integrated livestock system in Texas, USAPreventive Veterinary Medicine, Vol. 88, No. 4Political Communication and AgroterrorismStudies in Conflict & Terrorism, Vol. 31, No. 10Plant-Pathogenic Bacteria as Biological Weapons – Real Threats?Phytopathology®, Vol. 98, No. 10Economic Aspects of Agricultural and Food Biosecurity3 April 2008 | Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science, Vol. 6, No. 1A methodology for assessing the risk posed by the deliberate and harmful use of plant pathogens in EuropeEPPO Bulletin, Vol. 37, No. 2Agroterrorism: Where Are We in the Ongoing War on Terrorism?Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 70, No. 3Role of Import and Export Regulatory Animal Health Officials in International Control and Surveillance for Animal DiseasesAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1081, No. 1Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling in BiosurveillanceInfectious Diseases: Not Just a Health Matter Anymore Volume 2Issue 4Dec 2004 InformationCopyright 2004, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Roger Breeze.Agroterrorism: Betting Far More than the Farm.Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science.Dec 2004.251-264.http://doi.org/10.1089/bsp.2004.2.251Published in Volume: 2 Issue 4: January 5, 2005PDF download
- Research Article
31
- 10.2460/ajvr.68.7.772
- Jul 1, 2007
- American Journal of Veterinary Research
To determine serum concentrations of the selected acute-phase proteins (APPs) haptoglobin, serum amyloid A (SAA), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in pigs experimentally inoculated with classical swine fever (CSF) and African swine fever (ASF) viruses. 8 crossbred (Large White x Landrace) 10-week-old pigs. Pigs were allocated to 2 groups (4 pigs/group). One group was inoculated with the CSF virus Alfort 187 strain, whereas the other groupwas inoculated with the ASF virus Spain 70 isolate. Blood samples were collected at various time points. At the end of the study, pigs were euthanized and a complete necropsy was performed, including histologic and immunohistochemical analyses. Serum concentrations of APPs increased in pigs inoculated with CSF and ASF viruses, which suggested an acute-phase response in the course of both diseases. The most noticeable increase in concentration was recorded for SAA in both groups (up to a 300-fold increase for CSF virus and an approx 40-fold increase for ASF virus), followed by CRP and then haptoglobin, which each had only 3- to 4-fold increases. Serum concentrations of APPs increased significantly in pigs inoculated with CSF and ASF viruses. However, differences were evident in serum concentrations of the proteins evaluated in this study.
- Research Article
4
- 10.1515/bvip-2015-0002
- Mar 1, 2015
- Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy
The results of the study of lymphoid organs and sera of wild boars for the presence of DNA of African swine fever (ASF) virus and RNA of classical swine fever (CSF) virus are presented, as well as the results of a serological examination for the presence of ASF and CSF virus antibodies. The study was conducted in Ukraine between 2008 and 2013. Biological samples were obtained from wild boars shot during the hunting season, and were examined by real-time PCR and ELISA. In total, 5759 sera were tested for CSF virus antibodies and 4856 for ASF virus antibodies by ELISA. Samples of lymphoid organs totalling 1129 were examined by PCR for the detection of CSF virus RNA and 8102 such samples were examined for the detection of ASF virus DNA. CSF virus antibodies were detected in 6.56% of wild boar sera. RNA of CSF virus was also identified in 1 out of 1129 samples tested. ASF virus antibodies or DNA in lymphoid organ samples were not detected.
- Research Article
- 10.3390/pathogens14080804
- Aug 13, 2025
- Pathogens
African swine fever virus (ASFV) and classical swine fever virus (CSFV) are important transboundary animal diseases (TADs) affecting swine. ASFV is a large DNA virus with a genome size of 170–190+ kilobases (kB) belonging to the family Asfarviridae, genus Asfivirus. CSFV is a single-stranded RNA virus with a genome size of approximately 12 kB, belonging to the family Flaviviridae, genus Pestivirus. Outbreaks involving either one of these viruses result in similar disease syndromes and significant economic impacts from: (i) high morbidity and mortality events; (ii) control measures which include culling and quarantine; and (iii) export restrictions of swine and pork products. Current detection methods during an outbreak provide minimal genetic information on the circulating virus strains/genotypes that are important for tracing and vaccine considerations. The increasing availability and reduced cost of next-generation sequencing (NGS) allow for the establishment of NGS protocols for the rapid identification and complete genetic characterization of outbreak strains during an investigation. NGS data provides a better understanding of viral spread and evolution, facilitating the development of novel and effective control measures. In this study, panels of primers spanning the genomes of ASFV and CSFV were independently developed to generate approximately 10 kB and 6 kB amplicons, respectively. The primer panels consisted of 19 primer pairs for ASFV and 2 primer pairs for CSFV, providing whole genome amplification of each pathogen. These primer pools were further optimized for batch pooling and thermocycling conditions, resulting in a total of 5 primer pools/reactions used for ASFV and 2 primer pairs/reactions for CSFV. The ASFV primer panel was tested on viral DNA extracted from blood collected from pigs experimentally infected with ASFV genotype I and genotype II viruses. The CSFV primer panel was tested on 11 different strains of CSFV representing the three known CSFV genotypes, and 21 clinical samples collected from pigs experimentally infected with two different genotype 1 CSF viruses. ASFV and CSFV amplicons from optimized PCR were subsequently sequenced on the Oxford Nanopore MinION platform. The targeted protocols for these viruses resulted in an average coverage greater than 1,000X for ASFV, with 99% of the genome covered, and 10,000X–20,000X for CSFV, with 97% to 99% of the genomes covered. The ASFV targeted whole genome sequencing protocol has been optimized for genotype II ASF viruses that have been responsible for the more recent outbreaks outside of Africa. The CSFV targeted whole genome sequencing protocol has universal applications for the detection of all CSFV genotypes. Protocols developed and evaluated here will be essential complementary tools for early pathogen detection and differentiation, as well as genetic characterization of these high-consequence swine viruses, globally and within the United States, should an outbreak occur.
- Research Article
- 10.1101/2025.07.16.665162
- Jul 18, 2025
- bioRxiv
African swine fever virus (ASFV) and classical swine fever virus (CSFV) are important transboundary animal diseases (TADs) affecting swine. ASFV is a large DNA virus with a genome size of 170-190 kilobases (kB) belonging to the family Asfarviridae, genus Asfivirus. CSFV is a single-stranded RNA virus with genome size of approximately 12 kB belonging to the family Flaviviridae, genus Pestivirus. Outbreaks involving either one of these viruses result in similar disease syndromes and significant economic impacts from: (i) high morbidity and mortality events; (ii) control measures which include culling and quarantine; and (iii) export restrictions of swine and pork products. Current detection methods during an outbreak provide minimal genetic information on the circulating virus strains/genotypes that are important for tracing and vaccine considerations. The increasing availability and reduced cost of next-generation sequencing (NGS), allows for the establishment of vital NGS protocols for the rapid identification and complete genetic characterization of outbreak strains during an investigation. NGS data provides a better understanding of viral spread and evolution facilitating the development of novel and effective control measures. In this study, panels of primers spanning the genomes of ASFV and CSFV were independently developed to generate approximately 10kB and 6kB amplicons, respectively. The primer panels consisted of 19 primer pairs for ASFV and 2 primer pairs for CSFV providing whole genome amplification of each pathogen. These primer pools were further optimized for batch pooling and thermocycling conditions, resulting in a total of 5 primer pools/reactions used for ASFV and 2 primer pairs/reactions for CSFV. The ASFV primer panel was tested on viral DNA extracted from blood collected from pigs experimentally infected with ASFV genotype I and genotype II viruses. The CSFV primer panel was tested on 11 different strains of CSFV representing the 3 known CSFV genotypes, and 21 clinical samples collected from pigs experimentally infected with 2 different genotype 1 viruses. ASFV and CSFV amplicons from optimized PCR reactions were subsequently sequenced on the Oxford Nanopore MinION platform. The targeted protocols for these viruses resulted in an average coverage greater than 1000X for ASFV with 99% of the genome covered, and 10,000X-20,000X for CSFV with 97% to 99% of the genomes covered. The ASFV targeted whole genome sequencing protocol has been optimized for genotype II ASF viruses that have been responsible for the more recent outbreaks outside of Africa. The CSFV targeted whole genome sequencing protocol has universal applications for the detection of all CSFV genotypes. Protocols developed and evaluated here will be essential complementary tools for early pathogen detection and differentiation as well as genetic characterization of these high consequence swine viruses, globally and within the United States, should an outbreak occur.
- Research Article
26
- 10.1186/s12917-017-1150-0
- Aug 1, 2017
- BMC Veterinary Research
BackgroundRecently moderate-virulence classical swine fever virus (CSFV) strains have been proven capable of generating postnatal persistent infection (PI), defined by the maintenance of viremia and the inability to generate CSFV-specific immune responses in animals. These animals also showed a type I interferon blockade in the absence of clinical signs. In this study, we assessed the infection generated in 7-week-old CSFV PI wild boars after infection with the African swine fever virus (ASFV). The wild boars were divided in two groups and were infected with ASFV. Group A comprised boars who were CSFV PI in a subclinical form and Group B comprised pestivirus-free wild boars. Some relevant parameters related to CSFV replication and the immune response of CSFV PI animals were studied. Additionally, serum soluble factors such as IFN-α, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ and sCD163 were analysed before and after ASFV infection to assess their role in disease progression.ResultsAfter ASFV infection, only the CSFV PI wild boars showed progressive acute haemorrhagic disease; however, the survival rates following ASFV infection was similar in both experimental groups. Notwithstanding, the CSFV RNA load of CSFV PI animals remained unaltered over the study; likewise, the ASFV DNA load detected after infection was similar between groups. Interestingly, systemic type I FN-α and IL-10 levels in sera were almost undetectable in CSFV PI animals, yet detectable in Group B, while detectable levels of IFN-γ were found in both groups. Finally, the flow cytometry analysis showed an increase in myelomonocytic cells (CD172a+) and a decrease in CD4+ T cells in the PBMCs from CSFV PI animals after ASFV infection.ConclusionsOur results showed that the immune response plays a role in the progression of disease in CSFV subclinically infected wild boars after ASFV infection, and the immune response comprised the systemic type I interferon blockade. ASFV does not produce any interference with CSFV replication, or vice versa. ASFV infection could be a trigger factor for the disease progression in CSFV PI animals, as their survival after ASFV was similar to that of the pestivirus-free ASFV-infected group. This fact suggests a high resistance in CSFV PI animals even against a virus like ASFV; this may mean that there are relevant implications for CSF control in endemic countries. The diagnosis of ASFV and CSFV co-infection in endemic countries cannot be ruled out and need to be studied in greater depth.
- Research Article
51
- 10.1186/s13567-017-0490-x
- Nov 28, 2017
- Veterinary Research
For the global pig industry, classical (CSF) and African swine fever (ASF) outbreaks are a constantly feared threat. Except for Sardinia, ASF was eradicated in Europe in the late 1990s, which led to a research focus on CSF because this disease continued to be present. However, ASF remerged in eastern Europe in 2007 and the interest in the disease, its control and epidemiology increased tremendously. The similar names and the same susceptible species suggest a similarity of the two viral diseases, a related biological behaviour and, correspondingly, similar epidemiological features. However, there are several essential differences between both diseases, which need to be considered for the design of control or preventive measures. In the present review, we aimed to collate differences and similarities of the two diseases that impact epidemiology and thus the necessary control actions. Our objective was to discuss critically, if and to which extent the current knowledge can be transferred from one disease to the other and where new findings should lead to a critical review of measures relating to the prevention, control and surveillance of ASF and CSF. Another intention was to identify research gaps, which need to be closed to increase the chances of a successful eradication of ASF and therefore for a decrease of the economic threat for pig holdings and the international trade.
- Research Article
4
- 10.3389/fvets.2023.1183360
- May 25, 2023
- Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Classical swine fever virus (CSFV), African swine fever virus (ASFV), and Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae (E. rhusiopathiae) remain endemic in many parts of China. Co-infections make distinguishing their clinical symptoms and pathological changes difficult. This study developed a multiplex real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (multiplex qRT-PCR) that can simultaneously detect CSFV, ASFV, and E. rhusiopathiae. Three sets of primers and probes were designed to target the CSFV 5΄ untranslated region, ASFV p72 gene, and E. rhusiopathiae 16sRNA gene. Multiplex qRT-PCR for simultaneous differential detection of these three pathogens was developed after optimizing reaction parameters such as annealing temperature, primer and probe concentrations, amplification cycles, etc. The multiplex qRT-PCR could detect CSFV, ASFV, and E. rhusiopathiae simultaneously but could not amplify other porcine pathogens. The assay's limit of detection (LOD) was 2.89 × 102 copies/μL for CSFV, ASFV, and E. rhusiopathiae. All correlation coefficients (R2) at higher than 0.99, and the amplification efficiency was 98, 90, and 84%, respectively. All correlation coefficients (R2) were higher than 0.99, and the efficacy of amplification was 84%. In a repeatability test utilizing standard recombinant plasmids, the intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CVs) were less than 2.27 and 3.79 percent, respectively. Lastly, 150 clinical samples were used to evaluate the assay's applicability in the field. The positive rates of CSFV, ASFV, and E. rhusiopathiae were 1.33%, 0, and 3.33%, respectively. And no co-infection among the three pathogens was found. The concordance rate between the multiplex qRT-PCR and single-plex commercial PCR kits reached 100%. This study's multiplex qRT-PCR could provide a rapid, sensitive, and specific method for the simultaneous and differential detection of CSFV, ASFV, and E. rhusiopathiae.
- Research Article
31
- 10.4142/jvs.2021.22.e87
- Jan 1, 2021
- Journal of Veterinary Science
BackgroundAfrican swine fever virus (ASFV), classical swine fever virus (CSFV), and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) are still prevalent in many regions of China. Co-infections make it difficult to distinguish their clinical symptoms and pathological changes. Therefore, a rapid and specific method is needed for the differential detection of these pathogens.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to develop a multiplex real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (multiplex qRT-PCR) for the simultaneous differential detection of ASFV, CSFV, and PRRSV.MethodsThree pairs of primers and TaqMan probes targeting the ASFV p72 gene, CSFV 5′ untranslated region, and PRRSV ORF7 gene were designed. After optimizing the reaction conditions, including the annealing temperature, primer concentration, and probe concentration, multiplex qRT-PCR for simultaneous and differential detection of ASFV, CSFV, and PRRSV was developed. Subsequently, 1,143 clinical samples were detected to verify the practicality of the assay.ResultsThe multiplex qRT-PCR assay could specifically and simultaneously detect the ASFV, CSFV, and PRRSV with a detection limit of 1.78 × 100 copies for the ASFV, CSFV, and PRRSV, but could not amplify the other major porcine viruses, such as pseudorabies virus, porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV1), PCV2, PCV3, foot-and-mouth disease virus, porcine parvovirus, atypical porcine pestivirus, and Senecavirus A. The assay had good repeatability with coefficients of variation of intra- and inter-assay of less than 1.2%. Finally, the assay was used to detect 1,143 clinical samples to evaluate its practicality in the field. The positive rates of ASFV, CSFV, and PRRSV were 25.63%, 9.36%, and 17.50%, respectively. The co-infection rates of ASFV+CSFV, ASFV+PRRSV, CSFV+PRRSV, and ASFV+CSFV+PRRSV were 2.45%, 2.36%, 1.57%, and 0.17%, respectively.ConclusionsThe multiplex qRT-PCR developed in this study could provide a rapid, sensitive, specific diagnostic tool for the simultaneous and differential detection of ASFV, CSFV, and PRRSV.
- Research Article
2
- 10.3390/ani14233551
- Dec 9, 2024
- Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
African swine fever virus (ASFV), classical swine fever virus (CSFV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), and porcine pseudorabies virus (PRV) induce similar clinical signs in infected pigs, including hyperthermia, anorexia, hemorrhage, respiratory distress, neurological symptoms, and/or abortions in pregnant sows. The differential diagnosis of these diseases relies on laboratory examinations. In this study, a quadruplex RT-qPCR was established using four pairs of specific primers and probes aimed at the B646L (p72) gene of ASFV, the 5' untranslated region (5'UTR) of CSFV, the ORF6 gene of PRRSV, and the gB gene of PRV for the detection and differentiation of ASFV, CSFV, PRRSV, and PRV. The assay exhibited great sensitivity with limits of detection (LODs) of 134.585, 139.831, 147.076, and 142.331 copies/reaction for ASFV, CSFV, PRRSV, and PRV, respectively. The assay exclusively identified ASFV, CSFV, PRRSV, and PRV, yielding negative results for the other control swine viruses used in this study. The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CVs) were not higher than 1.12%, indicating good reproducibility of the assay. The quadruplex RT-qPCR assay was used to analyze 3116 clinical tissue samples from pigs in Guangxi province, China, from April 2023 to September 2024. ASFV, CSFV, PRRSV, and PRV had positivity rates of 10.84% (338/3116), 0.80% (25/3116), 14.92% (465/3116), and 1.38% (43/3116), respectively, demonstrating a coincidence rate of ≥99.45% with the previously described RT-qPCR assays, which were also used to test these same samples. The established assay was rapid, sensitive, and accurate in detecting and differentiating ASFV, CSFV, PRRSV, and PRV.
- Research Article
- 10.1155/tbed/5512419
- Jan 1, 2026
- Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
African swine fever (ASF), a highly fatal disease often termed the “number one killer” of pigs, presents clinical symptoms indistinguishable from classical swine fever (CSF), such as fever, diarrhea, and vomiting, complicating on‐site differential diagnosis. As both ASF and CSF are notifiable diseases under the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH), rapid and accurate identification is crucial for effective outbreak management. In this study, we developed a multicolor lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) based on latex microspheres (LMs) for the simultaneous detection of antibodies against ASF virus (ASFV) and CSF virus (CSFV). The assay enables visual differentiation within 15 min, with red indicating ASFV antibodies and blue indicating CSFV antibodies. After optimization, the LFIA demonstrated a sensitivity of 1:256, equivalent to that of a commercial ASFV ELISA kit and four‐fold higher than that for CSFV (1:64). The assay exhibited high specificity, showing no cross‐reactivity with other common swine pathogens and bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV). When applied to 180 clinical serum samples and compared with commercial ELISA kits, the LFIA achieved Cohen’s kappa values of 0.986 for ASFV and 0.918 for CSFV, indicating excellent agreement. Additionally, intra and interbatch evaluations confirmed its robust repeatability. Overall, the multicolor LM‐LFIA offers a rapid, sensitive, specific, and cost‐effective tool for point‐of‐care testing (POCT) of ASFV and CSFV antibodies, holding promise for routine field surveillance and disease control.
- Research Article
- 10.3389/conf.fvets.2019.05.00047
- Jan 1, 2019
- Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Integrating transportation and economic information for the African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) risk modelling purposes in the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS) using online data and grey literature
- Research Article
7
- 10.3390/pathogens12040533
- Mar 29, 2023
- Pathogens
African swine fever virus (ASFV), classical swine fever virus (CSFV), and foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) cause important transboundary animal diseases (TADs) that have a significant economic impact. The rapid and unequivocal identification of these pathogens and distinction from other animal diseases based on clinical symptoms in the field is difficult. Nevertheless, early pathogen detection is critical in limiting their spread and impact as is the availability of a reliable, rapid, and cost-effective diagnostic test. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility to identify ASFV, CSFV, and FMDV in field samples using next generation sequencing of short PCR products as a point-of-care diagnostic. We isolated nucleic acids from tissue samples of animals in Mongolia that were infected with ASFV (2019), CSFV (2015), or FMDV (2018), and performed conventional (RT-) PCR using primers recommended by the Terrestrial Animal Health Code of the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH). The (RT-) PCR products were then sequenced in Mongolia using the MinION nanopore portable sequencer. The resulting sequencing reads successfully identified the respective pathogens that exhibited 91-100% nucleic acid similarity to the reference strains. Phylogenetic analyses suggest that the Mongolian virus isolates are closely related to other isolates circulating in the same geographic region. Based on our results, sequencing short fragments derived by conventional (RT-) PCR is a reliable approach for rapid point-of-care diagnostics for ASFV, CSFV, and FMDV even in low-resource countries.
- Research Article
17
- 10.3389/fvets.2022.926881
- Jun 24, 2022
- Frontiers in Veterinary Science
African swine fever (ASF), classical swine fever (CSF), and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) are highly infectious diseases of domestic pigs and wild boars. The co-infections of ASF virus (ASFV), CSF virus (CSFV), and PRRS virus (PRRSV) have been reported in different pig farms. Early differential detection and diagnosis of ASFV, CSFV, and PRRSV in the clinical samples is very important for the effective prevention and control of these diseases. A multiplex crystal digital PCR (dPCR) was developed for differential detection of ASFV, CSFV, and PRRSV in this study, targeting p72, 5' untranslated region (UTR), and ORF7 genes, respectively. The different reaction conditions were optimized, and the specificity, sensitivity, and repeatability of the assay were evaluated. The results showed that the multiplex crystal dPCR was able to accurately and differentially detect ASFV, CSFV, and PRRSV with a limit of detection of 4.69 × 10−1 copies/μl, respectively, and could not detect other porcine viruses, i.e., foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV), Senecavirus A (SVA), atypical porcine pestivirus (APPV), pseudorabies virus (PRV), porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2), and porcine parvovirus (PPV). The assay showed excellent repeatability and reproducibility, with coefficients of variation (CV) of the intra- and inter-assay from 0.09 to 1.40%, and from 0.64 to 2.26%, respectively. The 289 clinical samples from different pig herds in Guangxi province, China, were tested by the multiplex crystal dPCR and a reference multiplex real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) established previously in our laboratory. The positive rates of ASFV, CSFV, and PRRSV were 30.10, 13.49, and 22.49% by the multiplex crystal dPCR, and 24.57, 8.65, and 18.34% by the multiplex qRT-PCR, with coincidence rates of 94.66, 95.16, and 95.84%, respectively. The results indicated that the established multiplex crystal dPCR was a specific, sensitive, and accurate method for the detection and quantification of ASFV, CSFV, and PRRSV. This is the first report on the multiplex dPCR for detecting ASFV, CSFV, and PRRSV.
- Research Article
14
- 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.10.027
- Nov 16, 2016
- Acta Tropica
African and classical swine fever situation in Ivory-Coast and neighboring countries, 2008–2013
- Research Article
32
- 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.114006
- Oct 27, 2020
- Journal of Virological Methods
Development a multiplex RT-PCR assay for simultaneous detection of African swine fever virus, classical swine fever virus and atypical porcine pestivirus
- Ask R Discovery
- Chat PDF
AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.