Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the agreement between the clinical history method (CHM), Orbscan IIz, and Pentacam in estimating corneal power after myopic excimer laser surgery. Fifty five patients who had myopic LASIK/PRK were recruited into this study. One eye of each patient was randomly selected by a computer-generated process. At 6 months after surgery, postoperative corneal power was calculated from the CHM, Orbscan IIz total optical power at the 3.0 and 4.0 mm zones, and Pentacam equivalent keratometric readings (EKRs) at 3.0, 4.0, and 4.5 mm. Statistical analyses included multilevel models, Pearson’s correlation test, and Bland-Altman plots. The Orbscan IIz 3.0-mm and 4.0 mm total optical power, and Pentacam 3.0-mm, 4.0-mm, and 4.5-mm EKR values had strong linear positive correlations with the CHM values (r = 0.90–0.94, P = <0.001, for all comparisons, Pearson’s correlation). However, only Pentacam 3.0-mm EKR was not statistically different from CHM (P = 0.17, multilevel models). The mean 3.0- and 4.0-mm total optical powers of the Orbscan IIz were significantly flatter than the values derived from CHM, while the average EKRs of the Pentacam at 4.0 and 4.5 mm were significantly steeper. The mean Orbscan IIz 3.0-mm total optical power was the lowest keratometric reading compared to the other 5 values. Large 95% LoA was observed between each of these values, particularly EKRs, and those obtained with the CHM. The width of the 95% LoA was narrowest for Orbscan IIz 3.0-mm total optical power. In conclusion, the keratometric values extracted from these 3 methods were disparate, either because of a statistically significant difference in the mean values or moderate agreement between them. Therefore, they are not considered equivalent and cannot be used interchangeably.

Highlights

  • Cataract surgery in eyes with prior keratorefractive surgery can be challenging for ophthalmologists because of the difficulty in precisely calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power

  • Alterations in corneal shape after keratorefractive surgery can cause the inability of standard keratometry or computerized videokeratography to accurately measure anterior corneal curvature, the use of an invalid conventional keratometric index of refraction to calculate corneal power, and the inefficiency of most modern IOL formulas in predicting the effective lens position [1]

  • Other studies have compared the Orbscan measurements with the clinical history method (CHM) and the Pentacam with the CHM separately, no studies to date have evaluated the agreement of the Orbscan IIz total optical power with the Pentacam equivalent keratometric readings (EKR) [1,9,14,18]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cataract surgery in eyes with prior keratorefractive surgery can be challenging for ophthalmologists because of the difficulty in precisely calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power. Alterations in corneal shape after keratorefractive surgery can cause the inability of standard keratometry or computerized videokeratography to accurately measure anterior corneal curvature, the use of an invalid conventional keratometric index of refraction to calculate corneal power, and the inefficiency of most modern IOL formulas in predicting the effective lens position [1]. Some surgeons consider the classic clinical history method (CHM), which requires preoperative information, to be the gold standard in calculating the corneal refractive power after keratorefractive surgery [2,3,4,5,6]. The aim of this study was to investigate the comparability of corneal power values obtained from the CHM, Orbscan IIz and Pentacam in post myopic keratorefractive eyes

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.