Abstract
BackgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to a need to introduce video telemedicine for outpatients as an emergency measure without widespread stakeholder consultation. The patient and clinician experience of video outpatient consultation during the peak of the pandemic was studied for acceptability and to gather recommendations to improve the service during continuing infection control measures.MethodsOutpatient video telemedicine was introduced over a 14-day period including the provision of equipment, systems integration and stakeholder communication. Patient and clinician experience were measured between 15 April 2020 and 5 May 2020.ResultsA total of 43 patients and 79 clinicians provided feedback. Of the patients, 86% were above the age of 30 years, with the largest patient group aged 51-70 years. Patient experience was positive. All (100%) patients found joining the video consultation easy; 93% of them recommended to use it for future consultations.Clinician satisfaction was >90% with sound and video quality. Patients were less satisfied than clinicians in that they had communicated everything they wanted to (86% versus 95%). All (100%) patients thought that the video telemedicine solution met their needs, but 25% of clinicians believed that the patient experience of a video consultation was worse than a face-to-face clinic appointment. The three significant factors identified for introducing video consultations were successful IT, improved patient experience and digital healthcare records.ConclusionsIn the COVID-19 crisis, video telemedicine played a central role in outpatient consultations with excellent levels of success. With some differences in satisfaction level, clinicians significantly underestimate the level of patient satisfaction with outpatient video consultation.
Highlights
The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has changed the dynamics of delivery of healthcare across the globe when the World Health Organization (WHO) reminded healthcare authorities across the world to take specific measures to protect the community, patients and clinicians [1]
All (100%) patients found joining the video consultation easy; 93% of them recommended to use it for future consultations
All (100%) patients thought that the video telemedicine solution met their needs, but 25% of clinicians believed that the patient experience of a video consultation was worse than a face-to-face clinic appointment
Summary
The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has changed the dynamics of delivery of healthcare across the globe when the World Health Organization (WHO) reminded healthcare authorities across the world to take specific measures to protect the community, patients and clinicians [1]. The need to reduce the contact and transmission of the disease led to the evolution of many ideas in which healthcare can be delivered remotely in a safe and effective way. This includes a change in the concept of outpatient clinic appointments to virtual clinics, reducing COVID-19 transmission risk. Recent studies on video telemedicine mentioned that solutions such as “Attend Anywhere” have wider acceptability to both clinicians and patients. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to a need to introduce video telemedicine for outpatients as an emergency measure without widespread stakeholder consultation. The patient and clinician experience of video outpatient consultation during the peak of the pandemic was studied for acceptability and to gather recommendations to improve the service during continuing infection control measures
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
