Abstract

In the modulation of longevity by natural selection there is a trade-off between the investment of resources in the maintenance of the body, or soma, and the investment in reproduction. There is accumulating evidence that long-lived mammalian species have much more efficient maintenance than short-lived ones. It is also clear that short-lived ground-living mammalian species reproduce very much more quickly than larger long-lived species, and in all mammals there is an inverse relationship between maximum reproductive potential and maximum longevity. These features of life-history strategies very strongly support the disposable soma theory of the evolution of ageing. Slow development and large size are associated with delayed ageing. If the environment changes, for whatever reason, small rapidly breeding species are able to adapt and survive much more easily that large slow breeding species. This can explain the very well documented extinction of many large mammalian species during the Pleistocene. In an environment which remains constant for a long period of time, selection favours the evolution of larger species, but these are put at risk if the environment becomes less favorable. Fluctuating environments are more likely to promote the evolution of small short-lived species with high fecundity.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.