Abstract

BackgroundShort monocular deprivation (4 days) induces a shift in the ocular dominance of binocular neurons in the juvenile mouse visual cortex but is ineffective in adults. Recently, it has been shown that an ocular dominance shift can still be elicited in young adults (around 90 days of age) by longer periods of deprivation (7 days). Whether the same is true also for fully mature animals is not yet known.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe therefore studied the effects of different periods of monocular deprivation (4, 7, 14 days) on ocular dominance in C57Bl/6 mice of different ages (25 days, 90–100 days, 109–158 days, 208–230 days) using optical imaging of intrinsic signals. In addition, we used a virtual optomotor system to monitor visual acuity of the open eye in the same animals during deprivation. We observed that ocular dominance plasticity after 7 days of monocular deprivation was pronounced in young adult mice (90–100 days) but significantly weaker already in the next age group (109–158 days). In animals older than 208 days, ocular dominance plasticity was absent even after 14 days of monocular deprivation. Visual acuity of the open eye increased in all age groups, but this interocular plasticity also declined with age, although to a much lesser degree than the optically detected ocular dominance shift.Conclusions/SignificanceThese data indicate that there is an age-dependence of both ocular dominance plasticity and the enhancement of vision after monocular deprivation in mice: ocular dominance plasticity in binocular visual cortex is most pronounced in young animals, reduced but present in adolescence and absent in fully mature animals older than 110 days of age. Mice are thus not basically different in ocular dominance plasticity from cats and monkeys which is an absolutely essential prerequisite for their use as valid model systems of human visual disorders.

Highlights

  • Ocular dominance plasticity induced by monocular eyelid suture is one of the best studied models of experience-dependent cortical plasticity [1]

  • We show that there is an age-dependence of both ocular dominance plasticity in the visual cortex and the increase in visual acuity after monocular deprivation: while in mice younger than 100 days, monocular deprivation induced a significant ocular dominance shift, such a shift was absent in animals aged 110– 230 days even after longer deprivation times, and the enhancement of vision of the nondeprived eye significantly declined in animals older than 110 days

  • Ocular dominance plasticity after monocular deprivation declines with age We studied ocular dominance plasticity in the visual cortex using mice of four different age groups: PD25, PD95, PD130 and PD215

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ocular dominance plasticity induced by monocular eyelid suture is one of the best studied models of experience-dependent cortical plasticity [1]. Brief monocular deprivation in early postnatal life induces a shift in the ocular dominance of binocular neurons towards the open eye [4,5]. The peak of the critical period for ocular dominance plasticity lies between postnatal days 25 and 30, when four days of monocular deprivation are sufficient to make binocular cortical neurons responsive to both eyes [5]. Recently it has been observed that ocular dominance plasticity can be observed in young adult mice, after longer deprivation periods (6–7 days) [6,7,8]. Short monocular deprivation (4 days) induces a shift in the ocular dominance of binocular neurons in the juvenile mouse visual cortex but is ineffective in adults. Whether the same is true for fully mature animals is not yet known

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.