Abstract
This paper shows that advocacy coalitions surrounding the establishment of a European Deposit Insurance System lead to spillovers into incompatible areas. Alternative spillovers were to increased public backstops and state aid. Intent to minimize costs, Germany and the Netherlands have pushed for wide-ranging risk reduction measures: that go to the core of financial practices in southern Europe, while Italy has pushed for greater public backstops and state aid within EMU. Unable to break the deadlock in Council, the EU awaits Basel Committee guidance on how to deal with sovereign risk exposures in its 2017–2018 work program.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
