Abstract

BackgroundIn a health care system based on managed competition it is important that health insurers are able to channel their enrolees to preferred care providers. However, enrolees are often very negative about financial incentives and any limitations in their choice of care provider. Therefore, a Dutch health insurance company conducted an experiment to study the effectiveness of a new method of channelling their enrolees. This method entails giving enrolees advise on which physiotherapists to choose when they call customer service. Offering this advice as an extra service is supposed to improve service quality ratings. Objective of this study is to evaluate this channelling method on effectiveness and the impact on service quality ratings.MethodsIn this experiment, one of the health insurer’s customer service call teams (pilot team) began advising enrolees on their choice of physiotherapist. Three data sources were used. Firstly, all enrolees who called customer service received an online questionnaire in order to measure their evaluation of the quality of service. Enrolees who were offered advice received a slightly different questionnaire which, in addition, asked about whether they intended to follow the advice they were offered. Multilevel regression analysis was conducted to analyse the difference in service quality ratings between the pilot team and two comparable customer service teams before and after the implementation of the channelling method. Secondly, employees logged each call, registering, if they offered advice, whether the enrolee accepted it, and if so, which care provider was advised. Thirdly, data from the insurance claims were used to see if enrolees visited the recommended physiotherapist.ResultsThe results of the questionnaire show that enrolees responded favorably to being offered advice on the choice of physiotherapist. Furthermore, 45% of enrolees who received advice and then went on to visit a care provider, followed the advice. The service quality ratings were higher compared to control groups. However, it could not be determined whether this effect was entirely due to the intervention.ConclusionsChannelling enrolees towards preferred care providers by offering advice on their choice of care provider when they call customer service is successful. The effect on service quality seems positive, although a causal relationship could not be determined.

Highlights

  • In a health care system based on managed competition it is important that health insurers are able to channel their enrolees to preferred care providers

  • The bargaining power health insurers have towards care providers depends largely on their ability to channel their enrolees towards contracted care providers [6, 7]

  • Every week 40.000–100.000 calls are handled. This is an opportunity for them to give, when applicable, enrolees advice on the quality of care providers and channel them towards good quality, preferred, care providers. They focused on physiotherapists, since the health insurance company had recently implemented a system to determine the quality of the performance of physiotherapists [26]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In a health care system based on managed competition it is important that health insurers are able to channel their enrolees to preferred care providers. A Dutch health insurance company conducted an experiment to study the effectiveness of a new method of channelling their enrolees This method entails giving enrolees advise on which physiotherapists to choose when they call customer service. Health insurers compete with each other, since enrolees are allowed to switch health insurers if they can get a better offer elsewhere This is an incentive for health insurers to contract care providers based on price and quality of care in order to be able to offer attractive health plans. They can compete by offering a high service quality [5]. When they are successful in doing so, the market share of these contracted providers increases, which gives health insurers more bargaining power in negotiations with care providers

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.