Advantages of an Emulsion‐Produced Ziegler‐Natta Catalyst Over a Conventional Ziegler‐Natta Catalyst

Abstract

AbstractSummary: Self‐supported and MgCl2‐supported Ziegler‐Natta catalysts, produced by two catalyst synthesis methods are compared. Borealis Polymers OY (Finland), who supplied the catalysts, developed the catalyst synthesis methods. The first method (Method One) is based on an emulsion system and consists of an in situ single step preparation. The second method (Method Two) consists mainly of two steps: formation of the catalyst carrier particles, and their subsequent impregnation with the active material. The results showed that Method One produced catalysts of compact, spherical particles with good intra‐particle homogeneity and a narrow particle size distribution. On the other hand, Method Two produced catalyst particles whose properties depended directly on that of the catalyst carrier: they were spherical but very porous, with a broad particle size distribution. Polymer particles produced with the two catalyst systems are perfect replicas of the catalyst particles. Fines formed either during catalyst preparation or during polymerization were observed only with the catalyst prepared using Method Two. The particles of the catalysts produced using Methods One and Two had similar activities, independent of the initial particle size. Fragmentation of catalyst particles was very fast for both catalyst systems and was only observed to be 100% completed using the catalyst produced with Method One. Studies of the thermal properties showed that the catalyst prepared using Method One produced poly(propylene) of higher crystallinity and with a narrower melting peak.SEM images of polymer particles produced by (A) Method One and (B) Method Two.magnified imageSEM images of polymer particles produced by (A) Method One and (B) Method Two.