Advances in the application of registration methods of computer-aided dynamic intraoperative navigation in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A systematic review.

Infinite cornucopia: The future of education and training in oral and maxillofacial surgery

Oral and maxillofacial surgery has seen various advancements throughout years. From dental implants to 3D printing, every advancement this field has witnessed has taken it one step ahead into the future. Reconstructive surgeries in oral and maxillofacial surgery have evolved drastically over the years. Till now, autografts are considered the best possible alternative to soft tissue or hard tissue defects. The advent of 3D bioprinting has not only broadened the vision of surgeons, physicians, and bioengineers but also enkindled the hope for a better future in reconstructive surgeries. All in all, the facial structures are full of complexities and loss of tissues in maxillofacial area is much common. 3D bioprinting with the ability to print a tissue with pre-defined arrangement of cells having its own vascularization can prove to be a valuable tool in the field of maxillofacial surgeries. Although still it has a long way to go to make it accessible for all, 3D bioprinting can be considered an asset for the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery. This article throws some light on the applications of 3D bioprinting in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery and the promising future it holds in reconstructive surgeries.Structured abstract is required. Please provide.Respected sir/madam, This is a mini review article and as per the submission guidelines for abstract in the Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, no instructions were given about the structured abstract for mini review. But, with due respect, if we are mistaken, then kindly guide us regarding the same and give us couple of days more to rectify this mistake. Regards.Kindly check and confirm whether the corresponding author and mail gigiid is correctly identified.Yes, the corresponding author and mail id is correctly identified.Journal standard instruction requires a structured abstract; however, none was provided. Please supply an Abstract with subsections "supply required Abstract sections separated by ;".Respected sir/madam, This is a mini review article and as per the submission guidelines for abstract in the journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, no instructions were given about the structured abstract for mini review. But, with due respect if we are mistaken kindly guide us regarding the same and give us couple of days more to rectify this mistake. Regards.Please confirm if the author names are presented accurately and in the correct sequence (given name, middle name/initial, family name). Author 3 Given name: [Gurinder Bir Singh] Last name [Thind]. Also, kindly confirm the details in the metadata are correct.Yes, Author 3 given name is in correct order. Given name : Gurinder Middle Name : Bir Singh Last Name: Thind Yes, details are correct.As per the instruction, other language titles like ……….. are required, but are not provided. Could you please provide the missing titles?There are no other language titles in this mini review article.As per the instruction, other language abstracts like ……….. are required, but are not provided. Could you please provide the other language abstracts?There are no other language abstract in this article.

The Journal of Clinical PharmacologyVolume 20, Issue 2-3 p. 98-106 An Analgesic Relative Potency Assay Comparing Zomepirac Sodium and Aspirin STEPHEN A. COOPER D.M.D., Ph.D., Corresponding Author STEPHEN A. COOPER D.M.D., Ph.D. Department of Oral and Maxillo-facial Surgery, New Jersey Dental School, Newark, N.J. 07103 Departments of Pharmacology and Oral Surgery, Georgetown University School of Dentistry, Washington, D.C., and McNeil Laboratories, Fort Washington, Penn. 19034.Director of Research, New Jersey Dental School, 100 Bergen Street, Newark, N.J. 07103.Search for more papers by this authorDONALD C. REYNOLDS D.D.S., DONALD C. REYNOLDS D.D.S. Department of Oral and Maxillo-facial Surgery, New Jersey Dental School, Newark, N.J. 07103 Departments of Pharmacology and Oral Surgery, Georgetown University School of Dentistry, Washington, D.C., and McNeil Laboratories, Fort Washington, Penn. 19034.Search for more papers by this authorGUSTAV. O. KRUGER D.D.S., GUSTAV. O. KRUGER D.D.S. Department of Oral and Maxillo-facial Surgery, New Jersey Dental School, Newark, N.J. 07103Search for more papers by this authorSTANLEY GOTTLIEB M.D., STANLEY GOTTLIEB M.D. Department of Oral and Maxillo-facial Surgery, New Jersey Dental School, Newark, N.J. 07103 Departments of Pharmacology and Oral Surgery, Georgetown University School of Dentistry, Washington, D.C., and McNeil Laboratories, Fort Washington, Penn. 19034.Search for more papers by this author STEPHEN A. COOPER D.M.D., Ph.D., Corresponding Author STEPHEN A. COOPER D.M.D., Ph.D. Department of Oral and Maxillo-facial Surgery, New Jersey Dental School, Newark, N.J. 07103 Departments of Pharmacology and Oral Surgery, Georgetown University School of Dentistry, Washington, D.C., and McNeil Laboratories, Fort Washington, Penn. 19034.Director of Research, New Jersey Dental School, 100 Bergen Street, Newark, N.J. 07103.Search for more papers by this authorDONALD C. REYNOLDS D.D.S., DONALD C. REYNOLDS D.D.S. Department of Oral and Maxillo-facial Surgery, New Jersey Dental School, Newark, N.J. 07103 Departments of Pharmacology and Oral Surgery, Georgetown University School of Dentistry, Washington, D.C., and McNeil Laboratories, Fort Washington, Penn. 19034.Search for more papers by this authorGUSTAV. O. KRUGER D.D.S., GUSTAV. O. KRUGER D.D.S. Department of Oral and Maxillo-facial Surgery, New Jersey Dental School, Newark, N.J. 07103Search for more papers by this authorSTANLEY GOTTLIEB M.D., STANLEY GOTTLIEB M.D. Department of Oral and Maxillo-facial Surgery, New Jersey Dental School, Newark, N.J. 07103 Departments of Pharmacology and Oral Surgery, Georgetown University School of Dentistry, Washington, D.C., and McNeil Laboratories, Fort Washington, Penn. 19034.Search for more papers by this author First published: February‐March 1980 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1552-4604.1980.tb02531.xCitations: 25AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Citing Literature Volume20, Issue2-3February‐March 1980Pages 98-106 RelatedInformation

PapersProgressive Maxillofacial Osteolysis. A Case ReportOtto KriensOtto KriensDepartment of Dento-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, GermanySearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:23 Jan 2015https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.1973.0017SectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail About Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byGorham disease of the mandible: a report of two cases and a literature reviewOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, Vol. 127, No. 2“Vanishing Bone Disease” in Maxillofacial Region: A Review and Our Experience11 February 2015 | Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Vol. 14, No. 3Vanishing bone disease of the mandible - a case report8 August 2013 | Gerodontology, Vol. 30, No. 4Gorham's disease: a case report and literature reviewOral Surgery, Vol. 1, No. 4Histological features and management of a mandibular Gorham disease: a case report and review of maxillofacial cases in the literatureOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, Vol. 106, No. 3Massive osteolysis (Gorham disease) of the maxillofacial skeleton: report of 2 casesJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 62, No. 2Vanishing bone disease in a five year old: report of a case and review of the literatureInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 32, No. 2Massive osteolysis of the mandible with subsequent obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: A case reportJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 53, No. 12Massive osteolysis of the maxillofacial bonesOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Vol. 70, No. 6Gorham's syndrome (massive osteolysis): A case reportJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 48, No. 11Gorham's disease affecting the maxillofacial skeletonHead & Neck, Vol. 11, No. 6Atrophy of the mandible: Reconstruction following fractureBritish Journal of Oral Surgery, Vol. 14, No. 2Presenile mandibular atrophy: Its aetiology, clinicalevaluation and treatment by jaw augmentationBritish Journal of Oral Surgery, Vol. 14, No. 1 Volume 2, Issue 2June 1973Pages: 62-154 © 1973 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology History Published onlineJanuary 23,2015 Metrics Download PDF

David Stanley Precious (1944-2015)

The aim of this bibliometric research was to identify and analyze the top 100 cited systematic reviews in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery in order to guide any professional level with interest in this topic and to map the current trends the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Using the Web of Science database without restrictions on publication year or language, a bibliometric analysis was performed for the five major journals of oral and maxillofacial surgery: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (IJOMS), Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (JOMS), Journal of Cranio-maxillofacial Surgery (JCMS),British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (BJOMS), and Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology (Triple-O). The most top-cited systematic review was published in 2015 with a total of 200 citations on survival and success rates of dental implants, consistent with the finding that "pre- and peri-implant surgery and dental implantology," and "craniomaxillofacial deformities and cosmetic surgery" were the most frequently cited topics (22% each). The majority of top cited papers were published in IJOMS (43%), followed by JOMS (34%), Triple-O (8%), JCMS(8%) and BJOMS(7%). The highest number of contributions was from the Netherlands, followed by Italy and USA. The outcome of this article can be used as a source of information and to guide not just researchers but also clinicians and students to which areas are trending in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, thus also having a large impact on the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery. However, this article cannot reflect the quality of the included systematic reviews.

Case of the monthBilateral cemento-ossifying fibroma of the maxillary sinusA Barberi, S Cappabianca and G ColellaA Barberi1Seconda Universita' degli Studi di Napoli, Facolta' di Medicina e Chirurgica, Dipartimento “F Magrassi-A Lanzara” and 2Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia Istituto di Chirurgia orale e maxillo-faccialeSearch for more papers by this author, S Cappabianca1Seconda Universita' degli Studi di Napoli, Facolta' di Medicina e Chirurgica, Dipartimento “F Magrassi-A Lanzara” and 2Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia Istituto di Chirurgia orale e maxillo-faccialeSearch for more papers by this author and G Colella1Seconda Universita' degli Studi di Napoli, Facolta' di Medicina e Chirurgica, Dipartimento “F Magrassi-A Lanzara” and 2Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia Istituto di Chirurgia orale e maxillo-faccialeSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:13 Feb 2014https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.76.904.760279SectionsPDF/EPUBFull Text ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail About"Bilateral cemento-ossifying fibroma of the maxillary sinus." The British Journal of Radiology, 76(904), pp. 279–280 References 1 Su L, Weathers DR, Waldrom CA. Distinguishing features of focal cemento-ossifying dyplasia and cemento-ossifying fibromas (II). A clinical and radiologic spectrum of 316 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;84:540–9. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar2 Brademann G, Werner JA, Jänig U, Mehdorn HM, Rudert H. Cemento-ossifying fibroma of the petromastoid region: case report and review of the literature. J Laryngol Otol 1997;111:152–5. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar3 Fanibunda K, Reed MF. Cemento-ossifying fibroma of the mandible. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 1997;26:246–8. Link ISI, Google Scholar4 Bendet E, Bakon M, Talmi YP, Tadmor R, Kronenberg J. Juvenile cemento ossifying fibroma of the maxilla. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1997;106:75–8. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar5 Engelbrecht V, Preis S, Hassler W, Lenard HG. CT and MRI of congenital sinonasal ossifying fibroma. Neuroradiology 1999;41:526–9. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar Previous article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byResection of Giant Cemento-Ossifying Fibroma of Jaws by Intraoral Approach—A Case Report and Review27 June 2022 | The Traumaxilla, Vol. 20Cemento-Ossifying Fibroma in Maxillofacial Region: A Series of 16 Cases8 November 2019 | Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Vol. 20, No. 2A rare presentation of cemento-ossifying fibroma in the maxilla: A case reportActa stomatologica Naissi, Vol. 37, No. 84Osseous mass in a maxillary sinus of an adult male from the 16th–17th-century Spain: Differential diagnosisInternational Journal of Paleopathology, Vol. 31CT and MR imaging characteristics of histological subtypes of head and neck ossifying fibromaMasaya Kawaguchi, Hiroki Kato, Tatsuhiko Miyazaki, Keizo Kato, Daijiro Hatakeyama, Keisuke Mizuta, Mitsuhiro Aoki and Masayuki Matsuo11 April 2018 | Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol. 47, No. 6Huge cemento-ossifying fibroma of the mandibleInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 44Ipsilateral Maxillo-Mandibular Ossifying Fibroma4 April 2012 | Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Vol. 14, No. S1Two cases of multiple ossifying fibromas in the jaws28 March 2014 | Diagnostic Pathology, Vol. 9, No. 1Massive expansile ossifying fibroma of the mandible with osteomyelitis12 January 2014 | Oral Radiology, Vol. 30, No. 3Bilateral Psammomatoid Ossifying Fibroma: A Case Report and Review of the LiteratureJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 71, No. 4Ossifying fibroma of the nose and paranasal sinuses26 June 2012 | International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, Vol. 3, No. 2Imaging in the Diagnosis of Cemento-Ossifying Fibroma: A Case Series30 August 2012 | Journal of Clinical Imaging Science, Vol. 2Characteristic Radiological and Histological Patterns of Fibrous Dysplasia and Ossifying Fibroma of the Jaws at University of Nairobi Dental Teaching HospitalSurgical Science, Vol. 03, No. 04Bilateral mandibular odontogenic fibroma (WHO type): Report of a case with 5-year radiographic follow-upJournal of Dental Sciences, Vol. 6, No. 2Benign mandibular tumours: Two case studies from the Maya lowland site of Tikal, Guatemala8 December 2009 | International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, Vol. 21, No. 3Bone Pathology9 May 2011Bilateral central ossifying fibroma affecting the mandible: report of an uncommon case and critical review of the literatureOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, Vol. 111, No. 2Juvenile psammomatoid cemeto-ossifying fibroma: Two cases22 November 2010 | Basic and Applied Pathology, Vol. 3, No. 4A possible case of an ossifying fibroma in a Late Neolithic population from Portugal11 March 2009 | International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, Vol. 76A palaeopathological case of a right maxilla's cemento-ossifying fibroma1 January 2008 | International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, Vol. 18, No. 2Cemento-ossifying fibroma of mandible6 November 2007 | Australasian Radiology, Vol. 51Cemento-Ossifying Fibroma Occurring in an Elderly Patient: A Case Report and a Review of LiteratureLibyan Journal of Medicine, Vol. 2, No. 2 Volume 76, Issue 904April 2003Pages: 217-280 © The British Institute of Radiology History RevisedNovember 12,2001ReceivedAugust 06,2001AcceptedNovember 29,2001Published onlineFebruary 13,2014 Metrics Download PDF

The International Association of oral and maxillofacial Surgeons (IAOMS) is committed to quality patient care. The education of oral and maxillofacial surgeons has, however, been in constant evolution ever since the inception of this speciality; and this state of flux reflects the dynamic expansion of its scope. Oral surgery has a unique relationship with medicine and dentistry as it straddles both professions. To understand this dynamic expansion, it is pertinent to review the present scope of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Today an oral and maxillofacial surgeon’s training includes management of trauma, surgical reconstruction of acquired and developmental deformities, temporomandibular joint surgery, dentoalveolar surgery, preprosthetic surgery including implants, management of odontogenic infections, management of oral pathology, and administration of general anaesthesia and sedation. The oral and maxillofacial surgeon routinely treats patients with systemic diseases such as acute and chronic alcoholism, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular and pulmonary disease, neurological problems, as well as drug abusers. The new requirement for oral and maxillofacial surgery training programmes is 48 months with rotations in anaesthesia, medicine and surgery, and a minimum of 30 months in the oral and maxillofacial surgery service. Eighteen months of off-service rotations, most or all of which are taken at an intern or resident level instead of medical student or clerk level, give oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) residents high quality medical education. Their rotation in general surgery and surgical sub-specialties result in a broad exposure to the concepts and principles of surgery beyond that provided by the oral and maxillofacial surgery rotation. It is the dental education that differentiates oral and maxillofacial surgeons from other surgical specialties; therefore, formal dental education culminating in a D.D.S or D.M.D. degree is strongly encouraged. It is most desirable that this formal dental education be complemented by formal medical education culminating in a medical degree. [Jnl College of Medicine Vol.7(1) 2002: 27-29]

Maxillofacial and oral surgery in patients with thrombophilia: safe territory for the oral surgeon? A single-center retrospective study

Background: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery department is a diverse field in dentistry. Record maintenance has been established as one of the key factors in the success and integrity of health care institutes.Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the records of oral and maxillofacial surgery cases reported to oral and maxillofacial surgery department, Abbasi Shaheed Hospital and oral surgery OPD of Karachi Medical and Dental College.Methods: Cross sectional study was conducted in at ASH and KMDC from July 2019 to September 2019. The data from January 2017 to July 2019 was retrospectively noted through electronic surgical record of ASH and records of the Oral Surgery OPD of KMDC. Inclusion criteria was patients records of both genders of 5–70 years age, having complaint of any oral or dental pathology or pathologies, trauma and impactions. Data was calculated manually by calculating frequencies and percentages for the trauma, impaction and pathology cases of patients.Results: In 2017, 239 cases were treated under general anesthesia from which trauma 11. 45% (n=11), followed by 48. 11% (n=115) cases of oral pathologies, total 11.7% (n=28) cases of complicated exodontias. In 2018, among 211, 51.1% (n=108) cases were trauma followed by 39.3% (n=83) cases of oral pathologies, whereas, total 9.4% (n=20) complicated exodontias cases were observed. During 2019 (January to July), 168 cases 36.2% (n=62) cases were diagnosed as trauma, in oral pathology, overall 36.2% (n=62) cases were surgically excised. Total 23.2% (n=39) complicated exodontias. In 2017, 25122 cases were reported in Surgery OPD of Karachi Medical and Dental College. Total 36.2% (n=9097) teeth were extracted from which 1.93% (n=486) cases were surgical impaction. On the other hand, 1.65% (n=416) patients were treated through minor oral surgeries. In 2018, 29008 cases were reported in Surgery OPD. Total 42.7% (n=12377) teeth were extracted from which 0.92% (n=268) cases were surgical impaction. On the other hand, 0.71% (n=208) patients were treated through minor surgeries. In 2019, January till July 13028 cases were reported in Surgery OPD. Total 42.6% (n=5559) teeth were extracted from which 0.66% (n=87) cases were surgical impaction. On the other hand, 0.68% (n=89) patients were treated through minor surgeries.Conclusion: It has been concluded that evaluation of the records of oral and maxillofacial surgery cases reported to oral and maxillofacial surgery department, Abbasi Shaheed Hospital and oral surgery OPD of Karachi Medical and Dental College were high and appropriate measures should be taken in order to manage these problems timely and effectively.

Training the Future: Protecting the Scope and Diversity of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

John Herbert Sowray

Application of computer-assisted navigation systems in oral and maxillofacial surgery

Aim: This systematic review aims to evaluate the use of mesenchymal stem cells, particularly those derived from bone marrow, adipose tissue, and dental pulp in maxillofacial and oral surgery, focusing on their regenerative potential, clinical applications, and integration with biomaterials. Introduction: Mesenchymal stem cells are multipotent stem cells known for their immunomodulatory and regenerative abilities. Their low immunogenicity and differentiation capacity make them ideal for treating craniofacial defects and enhancing soft tissue repair. Materials and Methods: The review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO. The literature was searched across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from 2009 to 2024. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed for clinical efficacy and methodological quality. Results: Clinical trials demonstrated the safety and regenerative benefits of mesenchymal stem cell in bone and soft tissue reconstruction. Adipose-derived stem cell and dental pulp stem cell showed favorable outcomes in angiogenesis and healing, while bone marrow's cell proved effective in bone regeneration, particularly when combined with scaffolds. Discussion and Conclusions: Although results are promising, limitations remain in consistency and long-term outcomes. Optimizing scaffold integration, preservation methods, and delivery techniques is crucial. Mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies represent a powerful, minimally invasive alternative to traditional grafting in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

ABSTRACTIntroductionSystemic immunosuppressive medication and targeted therapies (IMTT) can increase the risk of surgical procedures to patients. The risks of continuing their systemic IMTT medication during the pre‐, peri‐ and post‐operative period must be weighed up against the risk of stopping their medication. Currently, there is a paucity of evidence and national guidance on the management of oral surgery and oral and maxillofacial surgery patients taking IMTT.Materials and MethodsA cross‐sectional online survey was distributed to clinicians within primary and secondary care who were providing oral surgery or oral and maxillofacial surgery services. Distribution was through the British Association of Oral Surgery (BAOS) and the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (BAOMS). The survey explored current practice and available guidance with regard to alteration of IMTT dosing intervals and contact with the prescribing clinician.ResultsOne hundred and forty‐six surveys were completed by clinicians working in oral surgery or maxillofacial surgery settings, and general dental practitioners with a special interest in oral surgery. The majority of responses were collected from clinicians practising in the UK both in primary and secondary care. The results show that clinicians frequently treat patients taking IMTT. Currently, there are a variety of approaches to managing patients on IMTT and a lack of standardisation across the specialities.ConclusionFurther research and evidence‐based national guidance, specifically for oral surgery and oral and maxillofacial surgery, would provide clarity on the optimal care for those taking IMTT.