Abstract
A multifactorial approach to assess and manage modifiable risk factors is recommended for older adults with a history of falls. Limited research suggests that this approach does not routinely occur in clinical practice, but most related studies are based on provider self-report, with the last chart audit of United States practice published over a decade ago. We conducted a retrospective chart review to assess the extent to which patients aged 65+ years with a history of repeated falls or fall-related health-care use received multifactorial risk assessment and interventions. The setting was an academic primary care clinic in the Pacific Northwest. Among the 116 patients meeting our inclusion criteria, 48% had some type of documented assessment. Their mean age was 79 ± 8 years; 68% were female, and 10% were non-white. They averaged six primary care visits over a 12-month period subsequent to their index fall. Frequency of assessment of fall-risk factors varied from 24% (for home safety) to 78% (for vitamin D). An evidence-based intervention was recommended for identified risk factors 73% of the time, on average. Two risk factors were addressed infrequently: medications (21%) and home safety (24%). Use of a structured visit note template independently predicted assessment of fall-risk factors (p = 0.003). Geriatrics specialists were more likely to use a structured note template (p = 0.04) and perform more fall-risk factor assessments (4.6 vs. 3.6, p = 0.007) than general internists. These results suggest opportunities for improving multifactorial fall-risk assessment and management of older adults at high fall risk in primary care. A structured visit note template facilitates assessment. Given that high-risk medications have been found to be independent risk factors for falls, increasing attention to medications should become a key focus of both public health educational efforts and fall prevention in primary care practice.
Highlights
Falls are the leading cause of unintentional injury-related deaths and non-fatal injuries in people aged 65 years and older [1]
Our study found that some fall-risk factors – namely postural hypotension, visual acuity, and gait and balance – were assessed over twice as frequently compared to the earlier United States, chart-based study [16]
Why did the present study demonstrate more frequent assessments and interventions compared to prior studies? Possible explanations for this finding include the publication of a number of systematic reviews and updated guidelines on fall prevention in major medical journals in recent years [7,8,9,10]
Summary
Falls are the leading cause of unintentional injury-related deaths and non-fatal injuries in people aged 65 years and older [1]. Accidental falls result in over two million emergency department (ED) visits [1], and fall-related injury care costs exceed $30 billion annually [4]. Most falls in community-dwelling older adults result from a combination of risk factors [7,8,9,10]. Data from over a decade ago from community-based primary care practices suggest that translation of fall-prevention evidence into practice was limited, with fall-focused physical examinations and treatment plans present in less than a third of medical records of patients who had sustained a fall [16, 17]. More recent evidence suggests that the quality of falls evaluation and management in primary care remains suboptimal [11, 12, 19]. The present study, sought to assess the current state of primary care for falls in the United States and identify factors associated with fall risk assessment by primary care providers among persons at high risk of falls
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
