Abstract

In the 1860s, during the heyday of moral suasion in San Francisco, administering the abstinence pledge was established as a means to control the drunkenness of police and firemen. Almost sixty years later, on the threshold of national Prohibition, San Francisco's Board of Health continued to employ the pledge to discipline employees found drunk on the job. Similarly, San Francisco's Progressive-era judges used the pledge, sometimes in combination with formal probation, to test the necessity of divorce or state hospital commitment. Long after the pledge was in disrepute in the temperance movement and among those who favored the medically supervised incarceration of drunkards, it continued to be a useful probationary and diagnostic tool for public administrators seeking a compromise between toleration and severity.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.