Adductor canal block catheters and post-TKA outcomes: Weighing pain management against complication risks.

Update This article was updated on February 6, 2019, because of a previous error. On page 105, in the subsection titled “Outcomes and Design” the sentence that had read “Furthermore, in a retrospective review, Houdek et al. 48 , at a mean follow-up of 8 years, demonstrated improved survivorship of 9,999 metal-backed compared with 1,645 all-polyethylene tibial components, over all age groups and most BMI categories” now reads “Furthermore, in a retrospective review, Houdek et al. 48 , at a mean follow-up of 8 years, demonstrated inferior survivorship of 9,999 metal-backed compared with 1,645 all-polyethylene tibial components, over all age groups and most BMI categories.” An erratum has been published: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Mar 20;101(6):e26.

What's New in Adult Reconstructive Knee Surgery.

What's New in Hip Replacement.

While it is generally accepted that most patients undergoing joint replacement do not require a cardiac stress test, individuals with existing or potential cardiac conditions may be at an increased risk of perioperative complications following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aims to analyze the immediate postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent primary TKA, comparing those who had a cardiac stress test with no abnormal results and subsequent cardiac interventions to those who did not undergo a stress test. This retrospective cohort study utilized the TriNetX Research Network. The first cohort included patients who underwent a stress test within one year prior to their TKA, had no abnormal results, and did not undergo cardiac catheterization within two weeks post-stress test (Normal Stress Test). The second cohort consisted of patients who did not have a stress test in the year preceding their TKA (No Stress Test). The study analyzed data collected between January 1, 2003, and January 1, 2024. To control for confounding variables, propensity score matching was employed. P < 0.01 was considered significant. A total of 13,881 patients successfully matched in each cohort. Within 30 days following TKA, patients in the Normal Stress Test cohort exhibited a significantly elevated risk of several complications: Transfusion (RR: 1.702), Myocardial Infarction (MI) (RR: 1.908), Acute Renal Failure (ARF) (RR: 1.504), Acute Posthemorrhagic Anemia (RR: 1.245), Wound Dehiscence (RR: 1.549), and Pneumonia (RR: 2.051). These results were consistent at the 90-day follow-up. Notably, the risk of death was only elevated before propensity score matching (RR: 2.115). Our findings suggest that the underlying conditions prompting the use of a cardiac stress test, including congestive heart failure and renal insufficiency, may themselves be indicative of a higher overall perioperative risk, regardless of the stress test results. Level III: Case-control study or retrospective cohort study.

Metabolic Syndrome Components and Its Impact on Acute Kidney Injury After Total Joint Arthroplasty

Prior Venous Thromboembolism Increases the Risk of Postoperative Thromboembolic Events and Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

What's New in Musculoskeletal Infection.

Primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures continue to increase. On the basis of data from 2000 to 2014, the frequency of THA in the U.S. is projected to grow to 635,000 procedures per year by 20301. The majority of implants from these procedures are expected to last >20 years. A study of 94,292 total hip replacements from the Finnish Arthroplasty Registry noted a survivorship of 58% at 25 years2. THA complications (especially periprosthetic joint infection [PJI] and dislocation), as well as perioperative management to optimize short stays and outpatient THA while minimizing perioperative complications, continue to draw heavy attention. Implant Design and Related Outcomes In a study evaluating 2016 data from the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) compared with other national registries, the authors found that cementless stem fixation combined with the use of ceramic and 36-mm heads was the current preference in the U.S., while other registries indicated that cemented implants and metal and 32-mm heads were most commonly used3. Cemented Versus Cementless Implants There is evidence that cemented implants outperform cementless counterparts in elderly patients when early complication rates are compared. On the basis of the recent Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) annual report, Tanzer et al. reported that, among patients >75 years of age who underwent THA, those treated with the best-performing cementless femoral stems had more early revisions (<30 days postoperatively) compared with those treated with the best-performing cemented implants4. These early revisions were mainly attributable to the risk of revision for fracture or loosening. This difference disappeared after 90 days following surgery4. Bearing Surfaces Metal-on-Polyethylene (MoP) Studies show better long-term survival with a metal-on-highly-cross-linked-polyethylene (HXLPE) articulation compared with metal-on-conventional, non-cross-linked polyethylene (CPE) in younger patients5-7. In a retrospective review of 101 hips in 84 patients ≤50 years of age, with a duration of follow-up of 15 to 20 years, cobalt-chromium (CoCr)-on-CPE showed a high rate of wear-related revision (13 of 101, 12.9%)5. In contrast, the authors of another report noted excellent 15-year survivorship and functional outcome with no wear-related revision in a cohort of 82 patients (89 hips) ≤50 years of age with CoCr-on-HXLPE6. An observational study from the AOANJRR showed that hips in which XLPE was used (199,131 procedures) had a significantly lower revision rate at 16 years following THA for osteoarthritis compared with hips in which CPE was used (41,171 procedures), regardless of the head material7. Ceramic-on-Ceramic (CoC) or Ceramic-on-Polyethylene (CoP) Clicking or squeaking continues to be present in a small percentage of patients who undergo THA with CoC components. In 1 report, audible noise was present in 6.4% of hips (48 of 749) following THA with use of fourth-generation alumina CoC bearings, although no patient underwent revision for clicking or squeaking8. The selection of CoP recently surpassed MoP as the most popular bearing surface used in THA in the U.S.9. Metal-on-Metal (MoM) A study from Korea demonstrated an acceptable rate of aseptic loosening (cup, 10.5%; stem, 6.1%) in a cohort of 114 hips treated with THA using 28-mm MoM components; the average follow-up was 20 years (range, 17 to 23 years)10. Nonetheless, the use of an MoM articulation continues to decline secondary to persistent concerns for metal debris-induced adverse local tissue reactions. Surface Treatment The authors of a prospective multicenter study reported that, at the 5-year follow-up, titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) acetabular shells with a porous titanium coating (PTC) had a higher percentage of gaps/radiolucency compared with plasma-sprayed (PS) acetabular shells from the same manufacturer (23% versus 5%). Patients in the PTC group had more patient-reported pain, although none underwent revision for loosening11. Short Versus Standard Stems In a randomized double-blinded study, persistent mid-thigh pain was much more prevalent among patients with a short Collum Femoris Preserving (CFP) stem (LINK) (19%) compared with a full-profile wedge-tapered Alloclassic Zweymüller stem (Zimmer) (7%) at medium-term follow-up. Both cohorts, however, had a high percentage of varus malalignment (14% and 16%, respectively), and the results may not be generalizable to other cementless designs12. The association between periprosthetic femoral fracture and length/geometry of cementless implants was also studied. In a cohort study of 5,090 consecutive, direct-anterior primary THAs performed at a single institution, the incidence of periprosthetic fracture using femoral components with 4 variations in length and geometry was evaluated13. All stems were of a single-taper wedge design from the same manufacturer, with 1 of 4 configurations: full-length, standard profile; full-length, reduced distal profile; short-length, standard profile; and short-length, reduced distal profile. There was a trend toward a higher risk of periprosthetic fracture in the short-length-with-standard-profile group13. It is unclear whether the same trend would hold using other surgical approaches. Head Size In a study using data from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database and including 186,231 patients who underwent MoP THA with use of a 28, 32, or 36-mm head, the authors found that the risk of dislocation was reduced with the use of 32 versus 28-mm heads, although the overall revision risk remained similar. Surprisingly, transitioning from 32 to 36-mm heads was associated with a higher risk of revision for all causes, including the risk of dislocation14. It appeared that 32-mm heads would be the optimal choice for MoP THA. Dual-Mobility Constructs Modular dual-mobility constructs employ a CoCr articular surface liner that locks into an outer shell of titanium. A systematic review of mid-term studies of dual-mobility constructs supports their efficacy in reducing the incidence of dislocation after both primary and revision THA15. The wear rate for contemporary dual-mobility constructs using an HXLPE design showed substantially larger magnitudes of initial head penetration and wear than those reported for HXLPE in fixed-bearing couples (twice the rate)16. It approaches a steady state after 2 years, making it comparable with traditional fixed bearings; future studies should address the long-term outcomes16. A propensity score-matched study showed that patients with a dual-mobility construct had a lower risk of revision due to dislocation, although there was no difference in the overall risk of revision between the dual-mobility construct group and the MoP/CoP group. The authors speculated that selection bias may have been present, as the dual-mobility construct group also showed a higher risk of revision due to infection17. Patient Factors in Relation to Outcomes Medical Comorbidities Dialysis dependence was demonstrated to be an independent risk factor for 30-day adverse events, intensive care unit (ICU) care, longer length of stay, and rehabilitation needs in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA)18. Patients with hepatitis C who received interferon or direct antiviral agents prior to THA appeared to have fewer postoperative complications, especially PJI19. Dorr Type In a matched comparative study, a higher incidence of femoral stem-related complications (mainly periprosthetic femoral fractures) was observed when using double-tapered wedge stems in Dorr type-A compared with type-B femora20. A study correlating proximal femoral morphology and leg length after THA showed that patients with a Dorr type-A femur and a high femoral cortical index (FCI, defined as the ratio of cortical width minus endosteal width to the cortical width at a level 100 mm below the tip of the lesser trochanter on an anteroposterior radiograph of the hip) were at increased risk of leg lengthening while patients with a Dorr type-C femur and a low FCI had an increased probability of shortening21. Body Mass Index (BMI) Several studies showed a higher risk of complications (up to 3 times) among THA patients classified as morbidly obese compared with normal controls22-24. In particular, researchers in the U.K. reported on, to our knowledge, the largest longitudinal cohort study to date analyzing the influence of BMI on THA outcomes (>410,000 patients)25. Patients who were morbidly obese (BMI of 40 to 60 kg/m2) had the highest probability of revision at 10 years (twice that of the underweight group), while 90-day mortality was significantly higher for the underweight group compared with those with normal BMI. Milder obesity (BMI of 25 to 40 kg/m2) seemed to have a protective effect against mortality25. In another study, patients classified as super obese (BMI of ≥45 kg/m2) had a greater risk of reoperation and readmission and greater 90-day costs compared with the nonobese cohort, but they had comparable quality-of-life improvements26. Patients classified as morbidly obese who underwent bariatric surgery prior to TJA showed a reduced comorbidity burden at the time of TJA, with reduced post-TJA complications; however, the risk of revision was not reduced27. While obesity seems to be a major negative predictor of adverse outcomes, some argue that THA is still cost-effective for morbidly obese and super obese groups and recommend against a cutoff threshold to avoid unnecessary loss of health-care access28. Preoperative Opioid Use Opioid use within 3 months preceding THA was an independent predictor of early revision, while obesity and anxiety/depression were also shown to predict early failure of treatment29. Significantly higher 30-day readmission and revision rates were observed among THA/TKA (total knee arthroplasty) patients with a history of long-term preoperative opioid use30. In another study, patients who used opioids preoperatively tended to have significantly lower patient-reported outcome scores and longer hospital stays, and were more likely to be discharged to a rehabilitation facility31. Tobacco Use In a recent study, smokers had a significantly higher risk of deep infection and reoperation after revision THA compared with nonsmokers, and the risk was higher than for primary THA32. The authors of a systematic review and meta-analysis found that former tobacco users had a significantly lower risk of wound complications and PJI compared with current smokers. Smoking cessation counseling prior to total joint arthroplasty is strongly advocated33. A history of smoking was also recently tied to increased risk of nerve injury in patients undergoing THA34. Surgical Approach The optimal surgical approach in primary THA remains controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies showed less pain and better reported function through 90 days postoperatively for the direct anterior approach compared with the posterior approach35. However, when comparing early revision rates (<5 years from index primary surgery), the direct anterior approach was associated with a significantly higher rate of early revision due to femoral loosening compared with the posterior approach, while the posterior approach demonstrated a higher incidence of early revision due to instability36. A Dutch joint-registry study showed small improvements in the 3-month postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for the direct anterior and posterolateral approaches compared with the direct lateral and anterolateral approaches37. Regardless of the different approaches, there are minimal differences in gait mechanics at early or late follow-up38. The long-term prognosis of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) neuropathy was also investigated. One study found that approximately 11% of patients had persistent LFCN neuropathic symptoms even at 6 to 8 years after direct anterior THA, and the most common presentation was numbness (37%). This, however, did not affect hip functional scores39. Complications There is substantial variation in reported THA complication rates among national databases and joint registries. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) tends to show the lowest rate of complications40. Medical Complications A study of 10-year Hospital Episode Statistics data from the U.K. including 540,623 THAs showed that postoperative medical complications decreased year-after-year despite a steady rise in the average Charlson Comorbidity Index score. The only 2 exceptions were lower respiratory tract infection and renal failure, which continued to rise41. Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) and Anticoagulation A systematic review found that industry-funded studies assessing thromboprophylaxis reported fewer patients with pulmonary embolism (PE), major bleeding, and mortality compared with nonfunded studies42. A cross-sectional study in 5 countries found that the rate of in-hospital VTE after hip arthroplasty was 0.16% in Canada, 1.41% in France, 0.84% in New Zealand, 0.66% in the U.S. (California), and 0.37% in Switzerland, while the benchmark was 0.58%. French data showed a higher rate, potentially because of the systematic use of ultrasound, which could result in the over-detection of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) but not PE43. A retrospective analysis of the NSQIP data set from 2008 to 2016 demonstrated that the risk of DVT was not associated with obesity in patients undergoing THA. The risk of PE, however, was found to be elevated in THA patients whose BMI was ≥35 kg/m2. The authors concluded that, since current pharmacologic anticoagulation regimens can reduce the DVT rate but have not been demonstrated to affect the rate of PE or death, the data do not support increased DVT anticoagulation in THA patients who are obese but without other VTE risk factors44. Dislocation Spinopelvic pathology dominated the literature on THA dislocation, with important research focused on spine-pelvis-hip radiographs in the sagittal plane and the related functional safe zone45-52. It has been proposed that the spinopelvic relationship be categorized according to 4 groups, as assessed at the preoperative evaluation (1A: normal alignment, normal mobility; 1B: normal alignment, stiff spine; 2A: flatback deformity, normal spine; 2B: flatback deformity, stiff spine). Special attention should be paid to the 2B population, for whom surgeons may consider using a dual-mobility construct with targeted 30° of anteversion relative to the functional pelvic plane (based on standing, rather than supine, anteroposterior pelvic radiography)45. A modified classification system was recently proposed on the basis of supine anteroposterior pelvic, standing anteroposterior pelvic, and sitting and standing lateral spinopelvic radiographs46. The classification system adds a hyperlordosis spinal alignment category (pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis [PI-LL] mismatch of <–10°) and suggests a new risk assessment tool incorporating sagittal spinal alignment (coded as a number) and spine mobility/stiffness (coded as a letter) to use in revision THA. This new assessment tool was validated in a group of 222 patients who underwent revision hip replacement for recurrent instability. Results for 111 patients who were evaluated using the new spinal function assessment were compared with a matched group of 111 patients who were not evaluated using the system. The dislocation rate was 3% among patients who had the new presurgical assessment compared with 16% for those who did not46. Patients undergoing THA with a history of lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) had a >100% increased risk of dislocation compared with those who had LSF 5 years after THA53. Another study found that fusion to the sacrum as well as multiple levels of lumbar involvement dramatically increased the risk of dislocation in primary THA54. Although there was no increased perioperative spike of dislocation in patients undergoing LSF following an otherwise stable THA, 1 study demonstrated that this population had a sustained elevated risk of dislocation (0.7% per year) compared with those without LSF (0.4% risk per year)55. PJI The past decade saw tremendous effort and focus on preventing PJI in patients undergoing TJA. Current unadjusted 1-year and 5-year risks of PJI following THA were found to be 0.69% and 1.09%, respectively. After adjustment, however, there was no detectable decline in the risk of PJI over time56. Once PJI is confirmed, the 1-year weighted mortality rate was noted to be 4.22%, and 5-year mortality, 21.12%, highlighting the devastating consequence of PJI57. A PJI consortium (International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections) recently published a guideline for comprehensive hip and knee PJI diagnosis, prevention, and treatment58-65. With the new evidence-based and validated PJI criteria in 2018, PJI diagnosis now consists of a scoring system for minor criteria in both preoperative and intraoperative diagnosis66. One recent study found that there is no difference in treatment success as defined by the Delphi criteria between patients meeting minor-only criteria and those meeting a major criterion of PJI diagnosis67. Another PJI scoring model assigns relative weights to the various risk factors for PJI following TJA. A previous open surgical procedure, drug abuse, a revision procedure, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) were deemed the most influential factors68. A positive association between postoperative urinary tract infection and PJI after THA or TKA was established in a population-based, retrospective cohort study of 113,061 patients (≥66 years old). No association was found between acute postoperative urinary retention and PJI69. Debate continues regarding the merits of 1-stage versus 2-stage revision for PJI. In a recent Danish study, the authors reported an encouraging 91% infection-free survival rate at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up when using 1-stage cementless revision in the treatment of patients with chronic periprosthetic hip joint infection70. In another study, about 30% of revisions had an increase in the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) between 2 stages, raising concerns about the potential for the emergence of resistant organisms between the stages of a 2-stage revision71. Postoperative Urinary Retention Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention have been defined, including an age of >60 years, intraoperative fluid administration of >1,350 mL, and intraoperative of an of risk factors related to postoperative urinary retention are and should be Although the percentage probability of periprosthetic femoral fracture using cementless stems was demonstrated to be only at 10 years, this dramatically increased to at years after primary another study the incidence of periprosthetic femoral fracture in stems found that the incidence of periprosthetic femoral fracture continued to increase after the decade and the incidence of aseptic loosening in the decade A study using data from the national found that the annual incidence of periprosthetic femoral fracture in primary THAs increased from of to of the of to In the report, type-C 4 more than and they were more commonly in cemented The incidence of with MoP is and an average of 5 years to metal the ratio have been shown to be higher in MoP (range, or compared with MoM (range, to Another study a level of and a ratio of to be a cutoff threshold for important MoP The levels of and to decline by and 3 months after potential in the femoral nerve was observed in 17 of patients who underwent the direct anterior approach in THA when were against the anterior of the although this was The authors of another recent study of the anterior in a relative safe to the to avoid In a recent retrospective cohort study using the A data was found to be associated with significantly lower rates of dislocation and aseptic revision of the acetabular following primary The authors when their results because of potential by In a double-blinded study in the U.K. that patients undergoing THA or the use of with an and to show a in the rate of surgical infection Current and The past decade has a rise in the incidence of both outpatient and THA, according to a recent comparative and have been for or to be while also patient supports a trend toward better postoperative outcomes when hip replacement is performed by While the majority of primary THAs are performed at surgeons are the majority of these A more relationship was by a New data set of of the was associated with a 2 to increase in the risk of complications, mortality, and revision relative to while hospital was associated with a increase in complications and a 4 to increase in The opioid has has more attention in recent years. regarding opioid after joint replacement surgery show that to of patients continue opioid use even at 1 year have been to reduce opioid without of A study indicated that fewer compared with 90 was associated with a in opioid and decreased opioid without pain scores and patient-reported In a retrospective review of patients who underwent THA and TKA reported a history of those reported and including respiratory and In this study, no patient with a who was an adverse It was also found that, for the patients with a who were or no differences could be found in the rate of Use is now an of the THA to reduce loss and the risk of by including the American Association of and Surgeons and the American of Orthopaedic Surgeons state that no of or time of administration have been shown to A recent randomized study did that multiple postoperative of reduced loss compared with a single preoperative The of 1 preoperative of 2 by 3 postoperative of of loss in Smoking A study from the demonstrated that level of 8 within 1 of TJA could significantly rates of smokers It also to of patients who reported as continued smoking and as more than after surgery among those who and A from demonstrated that the administration of could to for among patients undergoing THA, by a in postoperative pain scores of was also in reducing opioid and The of use in patients with undergoing THA or TKA was recently in a retrospective study of 2 of patients in the group and in the patients who received were not found to have a significantly higher infection rate than to the that PJI is an this study have been with the of with a a mainly a spinal using significantly the length of of patients undergoing THA by 1 Postoperative Current evidence that the postoperative of and levels following THA in patients with a normal preoperative level is the should be by risk factors and Preoperative and levels of and 4 have been as below which should consider postoperative and It has been that consider the use of the in for THA including of patients with THA with a had significantly higher than those without a and among the THA with a was greater for those The of The a of recently published studies related to the system that received a higher of In to in this 4 other with a higher of to hip replacement are to this review after the standard with a about to in an evidence-based in this treatment and risk of or after total hip a cohort study from national Danish Joint This to the knowledge, the largest study using the Danish databases to address the association between perioperative treatment and postoperative 30-day PE, and from all among patients who underwent THA. A total of patients were the study from to among received perioperative and did After use was not found to significantly increase the risk of PE, or The authors were to the of using on patients with previous and other in this of on outcomes after primary and revision total hip at the a cohort study patients who underwent primary or revision THA from through A using 32 factors found in the medical including 17 and of was used to the study population as index of of to and of With to in-hospital complications, differences were found only for wound complications and the and with patients had a significantly higher risk of mortality ratio of dislocation, wound and reoperation within 90 days and 1 year after primary THA. The authors did not a association of with aseptic periprosthetic or prior bariatric surgery outcomes following total joint arthroplasty in the morbidly A This meta-analysis studies from to 2018, with a total of patients who underwent THA or underwent bariatric surgery prior to TJA and the patients with obesity as the group. The study found that bariatric surgery prior to TJA was associated with reduced risks of medical complications, length of stay, and The risks of wound infection or and the long-term risks of dislocation, periprosthetic and revision were not the THA and TKA bariatric surgery was associated with a in the risk of PJI after but not after THA. of of and on in the after total hip the randomized The and in is a Danish study the and of 4 regimens or after THA. The was 1 surgery and 6 for for a total of 4 of the on the postoperative and patients were in the The authors found that significantly reduced compared with in the after The surgical approach versus for the study cohort was not which have the postoperative for

Routine Prescription of Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Perioperative Period is Associated With Decreased Rates of 2-Year Revision Surgery After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Purpose This investigation provides a rigorous systematic review of the postoperative outcomes of patients with and without chronic hepatitis C who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsWe queried PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Web of Science and the ‘gray’ literature, including supplemental materials, conference abstracts and proceedings as well as commentary published in various peer-reviewed journals from 1992 to present to evaluate studies that compared the postoperative outcomes of patients with and without chronic hepatitis C who underwent primary THA or TKA. This investigation was registered in the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews and follows the guidelines provided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. In our literature search, we identified 14 articles that met our inclusion criteria and were included in our fixed-effects meta-analysis. The postoperative outcomes analyzed included periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), aseptic revision, non-homebound discharge and inpatient mortality.ResultsOur statistical analysis demonstrated a statistically significant increase in postoperative complications of patients with chronic hepatitis C who underwent primary THA or TKA including PJI (odds ratio (OR): 1.98, 95% CI: 1.86 – 2.10), aseptic revision (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.50 – 1.67), non-homebound discharge (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.28– 1.34) and inpatient mortality (OR: 9.37, 95% CI: 8.17 – 10.75).ConclusionThis meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant increase in adverse postoperative complications in patients with chronic hepatitis C who underwent primary THA or TKA compared to patients without chronic hepatitis C.

What's New in Musculoskeletal Infection.

Diagnosing Seronegative Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties.

Lack of Difference In Co-Morbidities Associated with Deep Venous Thrombosis In Patients Undergoing Total Knee Replacement

Knee arthroplasty has emerged as an effective treatment for end-stage gonarthrosis. Although total knee arthroplasty remains the gold standard, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is an appropriate alternative for select patients. We sought to use a large, heterogeneous national database to identify differences in thirty-day complication rates between unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty as well as to identify risk factors for complications. Patients in the ACS NSQIP (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) database who had undergone total or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty from 2005 to 2011 were identified. CPT (Current Procedural Terminology) codes were used to select cases of elective primary knee arthroplasty. Statistical models employing univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors associated with the thirty-day incidence of morbidity and mortality after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Propensity score matching addressed demographic differences between the total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty cohorts. A total of 29,333 patients were identified; 27,745 (94.6%) underwent total knee arthroplasty and 1588 (5.41%) underwent unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Prior to matching, the total knee arthroplasty cohort was 63.7% female and had a mean BMI of 32.8 ± 7.3 kg/m(2), whereas the values for the unicompartmental cohort were 55.3% and 31.5 ± 6.5 kg/m(2) (p < 0.0001). The mean ages of these cohorts were 67.2 ± 10.1 and 64.0 ± 10.7 years, respectively (p < 0.0001). A previously developed and implemented propensity score matching algorithm was used to address the demographic differences. Following matching, the total complication rate did not differ significantly between the total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty cohorts (5.29% compared with 4.16%, p = 0.35), whereas the rate of deep venous thrombosis (1.50% compared with 0.50%, p = 0.02) and the duration of hospital stay (3.4 compared with 2.2 days, p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in the total knee arthroplasty cohort. Comparison of total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revealed no differences in overall short-term (thirty-day) morbidity and mortality. Although this study does not address long-term subjective outcomes or implant survival, these findings should provide helpful information for surgeons counseling patients considering total and/or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Intraosseous vancomycin results in lower superficial and deep infection rate compared with alternative intravenous methods in total knee arthroplasty: a time-stratified meta-analysis.