Abstract

Modern federal courthouse acoustical designs mandate a multidisciplinary approach in which architects, engineers, consultants, contractors, and court administrators work together to provide cost-effective designs which meet explicit speech privacy, room acoustic, and building systems background noise requirements. It is a primary responsibility of the acoustical consultant to understand and support implementation of owner standards, the U.S. Courts Design Guide criteria, and various tenant adjacency requirements, all of which present unique challenges. Owner standards vary from project to project in accordance with functional requirements, building location, economic constraints, and other project-specific needs. A new edition of the U.S. Courts Design Guide containing significant updates is expected to be published in the near future. Tenant adjacency requirements are often ambiguous and conflict with each other and with other project criteria. This paper examines a case study of three federal courthouse designs, focusing on challenges associated with intertwined project requirements, cost constraints, and the design-build process. The study translates federal judiciary and courthouse tenant requirements and provides insight into established design precedents. Solutions to design challenges are presented, which ensure future designs meet the acoustical needs of federal court facilities.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.