Abstract
Criticisms levelled by Tim Church on a previously published paper (Hoard et al., Neutron activation analysis of stone from the Chadron Formation and a Clovis Site on the Great Plains, Journal of Archaeological Science 19, 655–665, 1992) are addressed. We maintain that the methods and conclusions of our previous paper are sound. Our ongoing research is refining our methodology and continuing to produce significant archaeological interpretations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
