Acute-on-chronic liver failure: Definitions, pathophysiology and principles of treatment.

Defining Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure: Will East and West Ever Meet?

Toward an Improved Definition of Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

More than meets the eye: Severe alcoholic hepatitis can present as acute-on-chronic liver failure

Content available: Audio Recording.

The intensive care unit course and outcome in acute-on-chronic liver failure are comparable to other populations

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is defined by the rapid development of organ(s) failure(s) associated with high rates of early (28-day) mortality in patients with cirrhosis. ACLF has been categorized into three grades of increasing severity according to the nature and number of organ failures. In patients with grade 3 ACLF, 28-day mortality is >70%. While the definition of ACLF has been endorsed by European scientific societies, North American and Asian Pacific associations have proposed alternative definitions. A prognostic score called the CLIF-C ACLF score provides a more precise assessment of the prognosis of patients with ACLF. Although bacterial infections and variceal bleeding are common precipitating factors, no precipitating factor can be identified in almost 60% of patients with ACLF. There is increasing evidence that cirrhosis is a condition characterized by a systemic inflammatory state and occult infections or translocation of bacteria or bacterial products from the lumen of the GUT to the systemic circulation which could play a role in the development of ACLF. Simple and readily available variables to predict the occurrence of ACLF in patients with cirrhosis have been identified and high-risk patients need careful management. Whether prolonged administration of statins, rifaximin or albumin can prevent ACLF requires further study. Patients with organ(s) failure(s) may needed to be admitted to the ICU and there should be no hesitation in admitting patients with cirrhosis to the ICU. No benefit to survival was observed with albumin dialysis and rescue transplantation is the best option in the most severe patients. One-year post-transplant survival rates exceeding 70%-75% have been reported, including in patients with grade 3 ACLF but these patients were highly selected. Criteria have been proposed to define futile transplantation (too ill to be transplanted), but these criteria need to be refined to include age, comorbidities and frailty in addition to markers of disease severity.

Factors Associated With Survival of Patients With Severe Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure Before and After Liver Transplantation: Unanswered Questions

Macrophage markers and innate immunity in cirrhosis

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is characterized by an acute deterioration of liver function in patients with cirrhosis in combination with recently defined organ failures. Our aim was to independently validate the prognostic value of the recently established EASL-CLIF-Consortium definition of ACLF and to identify new predictors of short-term mortality. Patients with cirrhosis and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnosis of (sub)acute liver failure were retrospectively categorized according to the EASL-CLIF-Consortium definition. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify clinical and epidemiological predictors of 30- and 90-day mortality. From 2008 to 2015, 257 patients were included. Overall, 173 (67%) patients met the EASL criteria for ACLF (grade 1: n=43 [25%], grade 2: n=52 [30%], grade 3: n=79 [45%]). Mortality within 30days in patients without ACLF was 3.6%, and 18.6%, 37.3% and 62.0% in patients with ACLF grades 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Outcome of patients with bacterial infection-triggered ACLF was distinct from non-infection-triggered ACLF (71.6% vs 33.8% 30-day survival, P<.001), and infection-triggered ACLF was independently associated with increased mortality (odds ratio [OR]=4.28, P<.001). Pneumonia was a particularly frequent infection and burdened with high mortality. In addition, infections with multidrug-resistant organisms were frequent and independently associated with mortality (P=.030, OR=4.41), as was glycopeptide antibiotic therapy as initial empirical antibiotic therapy (P=.005). This study confirmed the EASL-CLIF-Consortium definition of ACLF as strong predictor of mortality in patients with acute decompensation of cirrhosis. However, we have observed a remarkably higher mortality in infection-triggered ACLF compared to other precipitating events.

We aimed to study the etiologies and clinical profile and to describe the factors associated with mortality in acute-on-chronic liver failure(ACLF)patients at our center. Patients meeting the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL)definition of ACLF were included. We studied etiologies and clinical profile and analyzed the factors associated with mortality in patients with ACLF. We also analyzed the mortality rates based on the number of organ failures and the grade of ACLF. 114 patients were included. Alcohol (82, 71.9%), drugs (22, 19.3%), and viral hepatitis (17, 14.9%) were the commonest precipitating factors of ACLF. The commonest cause of chronic disease was alcohol (83, 72.8%). Fifty-three (46.5%), 60 (52.6%), 44 (38.6%), 32 (28.1%), and 24 (21.1%) experienced renal, coagulation, cerebral, respiratory, and circulation failures, respectively. Overall, the in-hospital mortality rate stood at 54 (48.6%), with a median stay of eight days. Advanced hepatic encephalopathy and ventilator support independently predicted mortality.The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score outperformed all other prognostic scores in predicting mortality in ACLF. Alcohol was themost commonprecipitating factor for ACLF. The in-hospital mortality rate was 48.6%. Advanced hepatic encephalopathy and ventilator support independently predicted mortality.The SOFA score is a more accurate predictor of mortality in ACLF when compared to other prognostic scores.

We aimed to evaluate the effect of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) on patients' 1-year post-liver transplant (LT) survival. In addition, we evaluated the effect of ACLF on the development of post-LT chronic kidney disease (CKD) and early allograft dysfunction (EAD). A retrospective cohort of patients who underwent transplantation from 2010 to 2016 was studied. EASL-CLIF's definition of ACLF was used. The risk of post-LT death, CKD, and EAD was estimated with regression models weighted by inverse probability weighting considering the recipients' characteristics. Donor's BMI and donor risk index were included in the models as well. A total of 185 patients were included: 125 (67.6%) without ACLF and 60 (32.4%) with ACLF. The 1-year post-LT survival rate was 91.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 84.6-95.1%] in patients without ACLF versus 84.9% (95% CI: 73.1-91.9%) in patients with ACLF. Post-LT CKD occurred in 43 (38.7%) patients without ACLF versus 26 (52.0%) patients with ACLF. EAD occurred in 40 (32.3%) patients without ACLF versus 15 (28.8%) patients with ACLF. No effect of ACLF was found on survival (hazard ratio 1.75; 95% CI: 0.64-4.75, P = 0.272), CKD (odds ratio: 1.31; 95% CI: 0.60-2.86; P = 0.491), or EAD (odds ratio: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.38-1.66, P = 0.473). In this study, which included mainly patients with grade 1 ACLF at the time of LT, its presence had no impact on post-LT survival or on the occurrence of CKD or EAD.

OBJECTIVES To develop evidence-based recommendations for clinicians caring for adults with acute or acute on chronic liver failure in the ICU. DESIGN The guideline panel comprised 29 members with expertise in aspects of care of the critically ill patient with liver failure and/or methodology. The Society of Critical Care Medicine standard operating procedures manual and conflict-of-interest policy were followed throughout. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among the panel, as well as within subgroups, served as an integral part of the guideline development. SETTING The panel was divided into nine subgroups: cardiovascular, hematology, pulmonary, renal, endocrine and nutrition, gastrointestinal, infection, perioperative, and neurology. INTERVENTIONS We developed and selected population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes questions according to importance to patients and practicing clinicians. For each population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes question, we conducted a systematic review aiming to identify the best available evidence, statistically summarized the evidence whenever applicable, and assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We used the evidence to decision framework to facilitate recommendations formulation as strong or conditional. We followed strict criteria to formulate best practice statements. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS In this article, we report 29 recommendations (from 30 population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes questions) on the management acute or acute on chronic liver failure in the ICU, related to five groups (cardiovascular, hematology, pulmonary, renal, and endocrine). Overall, six were strong recommendations, 19 were conditional recommendations, four were best-practice statements, and in two instances, the panel did not issue a recommendation due to insufficient evidence. CONCLUSIONS Multidisciplinary international experts were able to formulate evidence-based recommendations for the management acute or acute on chronic liver failure in the ICU, acknowledging that most recommendations were based on low-quality indirect evidence.

Sarcopenia should be evaluated in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure and candidates for liver transplantation

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a complicated syndrome associated with high short-term mortality and reversibility. Whether the prior decompensation should be included in the definition of ACLF is controversial. A total of 532 patients with decompensation (prior or first) of chronic liver disease were retrospectively enrolled and analyzed from January 2018 to June 2023. Clinical data were used to identify the characteristics and determine prognosis. Of the 532 patients, 99 patients did not meet APASL-ACLF criteria due to the existence of prior decompensation and 433 patients met the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL)-ACLF criteria. The two groups had similar characteristics including prognosis scores (Chinese Group on the Study of Severe Hepatitis B (COSSH)-ACLF II score: 7.59 vs. 7.67, p = 0.934; Chronic Liver Failure (CLIF) Consortium ACLF score: 42.90 vs. 44.81, p = 0.273), the distribution of patients with APASL ACLF research consortium score (AARC score) (5-7: 19.2%/12.0%; 8-10: 56.6%/55.0%; 11-15: 24.2%/33.0%, p > 0.05) and the 28-/90-day mortality rates (30.5%/43.2% vs. 36.3%/43.1%, p = 0.267/0.978). In all integrated ACLF patients, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that COSSH-ACLF IIs had higher prognostic efficiency and clinical net benefit than AARC score and CLIF-C ACLFs for 28-/90-day mortality. Prior decompensated patients exhibited clinical characteristics and high short-term mortality similar to those of first decompensated patients. The COSSH-ACLF IIs demonstrated the highest prognostic efficiency for all integrated ACLF patients. Including prior decompensation in the ACLF definition can help to simplify and improve clinical management.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a critical syndrome that develops in patients with chronic liver disease and is characterized by acute decompensation, single- or multiple-organ failure and high short-term mortality. Over the past few decades, ACLF has been progressively recognized as an independent clinical entity, and several criteria and prognostic scores have been proposed and validated by different scientific societies. However, controversies still exist in some aspects across regions, which mainly involve whether the definition of underlying liver diseases should include cirrhosis and non-cirrhosis. The pathophysiology of ACLF is complicated and remains unclear, although accumulating evidence based on different aetiologies of ACLF shows that it is closely associated with intense systemic inflammation and immune-metabolism disorder, which result in mitochondrial dysfunction and microenvironment imbalance, leading to disease development and organ failure. In-depth insight into the biological pathways involved in the mechanisms of ACLF and potential mechanistic targets that improve patient survival still needs to be investigated. Omics-based analytical techniques, including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and microbiomes, have developed rapidly and can offer novel insights into the essential pathophysiologic process of ACLF. In this paper, we briefly reviewed and summarized the current knowledge and recent advances in the definitions, criteria and prognostic assessments of ACLF; we also described the omics techniques and how omics-based analyses have been applied to investigate and characterize the biological mechanisms of ACLF and identify potential predictive biomarkers and therapeutic targets for ACLF. We also outline the challenges, future directions and limitations presented by omics-based analyses in clinical ACLF research.