Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Requiring Two Cycles of Intensive Induction for Attainment of Remission Experience Inferior Survival Compared with Patients Requiring a Single Course of Induction Chemotherapy

Abstract

BackgroundAchievement of initial remission remains the most important clinical factor predicting long term survival in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients treated with intensive chemotherapy. Yet, whether the patient subset in need of a second cycle of intensive induction chemotherapy to reach remission experiences inferior outcomes compared to patients reaching remission after a single cycle of therapy, remains uncertain. Patients and MethodsRetrospective analysis of 302 consecutive AML patients treated with intensive induction chemotherapy in our institution in 2007-2020. ResultsMedian patient age was 55 years with a median follow-up duration of 23 months. In terms of European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 classification, 122 patients (40%) were designated as favorable risk disease, 108 patients (36%) were intermediate risk, and 71 patients (24%) were adverse risk. A hundred and seventy-seven patients (60%) attained remission following initial chemotherapy while 58 patients (20%) required an additional cycle of intensive chemotherapy for remission. Patients requiring 2 cycles to reach remission were less likely to be NPM1 mutated (33% versus 51%; P=.025) or be in the ELN 2017 favorable risk category (25% versus 57%; P<.001). In multivariate analysis achievement of remission following 2 cycles of intensive compared with a single cycle resulted in significantly inferior survival [hazard ratio (HR)=1.67, 95% CI, 1.07-2.59; P=.025] whereas leukemia-free survival was not significantly impacted (HR=1.26, 95% CI, 0.85-1.85) (P=.23). Relapse rates also did not differ to a significant degree between groups (45% versus 47%, P=.8). ConclusionAttainment of an early remission significantly impacts long term survival in AML patients.