Acute Ischemic Stroke of Undetermined Etiology in a University Hospital

Abstract

P8 Objectives: Ischemic stroke is classified as of undetermined etiology in approximately 30% of cohorts in many clinical studies of stroke, including the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST). We investigated this undetermined etiology classification in our own in-hospital ischemic stroke population, and sought to determine clinical features of acute ischemic stroke which may be more or less predictive of an undetermined etiology. Methods: The medical records of patients admitted to the University Hospital with ischemic stroke between 1990 and 1998 were reviewed. Etiologic classification was determined based on imaging and other studies according to the TOAST criteria as atherothrombotic, embolic, lacunar, of other determined etiology, and of undetermined etiology (UND). The last category was then subdivided into negative evaluation (UND-1), more than one cause identified (UND-2), and incomplete evaluation (UND-3). Clinical features that might predict undetermined etiology were assessed, including severity, age, gender, and previously known ischemic stroke risk factors. Results: Of 690 patients with ischemic stroke, 163 (23.6%) had undetermined etiology. Men and women had a similar rate of UND. In the categories UND-1, UND-2, and UND-3 there were 39 (5.7%), 52 (7.5%), and 72 (10.4%) patients respectively. Stroke with severe paresis and diminished sensorium had a low frequency of undetermined etiology (13%, p Conclusions: In clinical studies of ischemic stroke a determination of undetermined etiology may be due to an incomplete evaluation, or more than one likely cause, rather than a negative evaluation. There are clinical features on presentation of ischemic stroke that are predictive of a classification of undetermined etiology.